Mitigation Comparisons – 4 tanks

My only other major concern is if you have included critical block in your warrior tests. To me, this single ability is the one that makes warriors shine just that few percent over paladins.
_________________

11/11 KZ | 4/6 ZA | 2/2 GL | 1/1 MAG | 3/4 TK | 2/6 SSC | 4/5 MH | 5/9 BT

There was a post about the increase in base hp a while back. Hope this helps

http://www.failsafedesign.com/maintankadin/viewtopic.php?t=14270&highlight=health++increase+base

BTW! first post

This is good stuff OP. I hope they address our scalability in SBV.
_________________

Updated with correct Shield Block uptime, as well as Glyphs (one glyph across two classes effecting mitigation = http://wotlk.wowhead.com/?item=43425) and filling in the ranged slot (Initially left out as sigils and idols don't have equivelants)

It seems we are indeed 2-3% behind warriors in blunt mitigation all the way along, and anything from 4-7% behind in damage taken over time.

Concerning, I'll update the OP rather than mislead.

Many thanks for this btw
_________________

oh well I gues its not the end of the world , not much of a diference betwen what was in TBC and that then
_________________

Well you did a great job on re-establishing the said difference and quite possibly pointed out with your initial posts what blizzard bases their numbers on...Perhaps keep those for reference as well in the inital posts...

The visual the graphs provide is an extra bonus to get the point across..If only the Blizz forum supported the addition of images to a post
_________________

So GC is right, we are within a few %... just always negative.

OOC, can you run simulations giving RF 8/10% mitigation, altering Ardent to be something like 20% reduction under 50%, and similar changes? Lets see what actually brings those two lines into somekind of wavy union.
_________________
Armoury Link

how does DKs fit in with all this? or is it too complicated to fit in with all their cooldown abilities?