Lightbeard wrote:4 Pages and no one has mentioned grape drink yet?
thought it was grape drank?

Lightbeard wrote:4 Pages and no one has mentioned grape drink yet?
But by skipping over noble and necessary, and missing those points, I can make assumptions about your values base, since I've seen your thinking process.
Grehn|Skipjack wrote:This whole thread makes me lol.
Aubade wrote:Grehn|Skipjack wrote:This quotes make me lol.
Grehn|Skipjack wrote:This whole thread makes me lol.
Tinalt wrote:Grehn|Skipjack wrote:This whole thread makes me lol.
You need to take this more seriously. This is the future of our planet we're talking about here. How will our kids and grand kids be able to live if they're up to their necks in plastic bottles? Won't somebody think of the children?
Isetnefret wrote:But by skipping over noble and necessary, and missing those points, I can make assumptions about your values base, since I've seen your thinking process.
Is there anyone else in this group I should know about that actively seeks to make personal attacks? FFS.
thegreatheed wrote:Isetnefret wrote:But by skipping over noble and necessary, and missing those points, I can make assumptions about your values base, since I've seen your thinking process.
Is there anyone else in this group I should know about that actively seeks to make personal attacks? FFS.
LOL wut??
Just because I pointed out a flaw in your "logical" thinking, I'm actively seeking to make personal attacks???
L
O
L
Also, saying you have a different values base than I do is in NO WAY a personal attack. EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN THE ENTIRE WORLD has a distinct values base. And it affects their thinking and judgment. Merely pointing out that fact is a personal attack?!?! HAHAHAHAHAHA
Arcand wrote:By making assumptions about something as complex and personal as a person's value system (and I don't think anyone got the impression you'd reached flattering conclusions), based on a couple tiny scraps of data, it looks like you're in a hurry to get to the part where you're standing triumphantly over them, heaping scorn on their ideas. Throwing derision in your follow-up post doesn't do much to dispel the notion either.
Isetnefret wrote:But by skipping over noble and necessary, and missing those points, I can make assumptions about your values base, since I've seen your thinking process.
Is there anyone else in this group I should know about that actively seeks to make personal attacks? FFS.
me wrote:maybe you take carbon emissions as a more serious harm to a community than a family broken apart by addiction. if that's your values base, then you would see a ban on plastic bottles as more logical than a ban on illegal drugs.
you wrote:Indeed, one impacts the person using it, while the other impacts the environment that we all share.
you wrote:You don't know shit about my values and anything you THINK you can deduce from statements I've made here is wrong.
Drathian wrote: