ARE You UNCRUSHABLE? FIND OUT THE EASY WAY!
Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, Aergis, theckhd
23 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
ARE You UNCRUSHABLE? FIND OUT THE EASY WAY!
Has anyone tried this yet? Does it work and make life simple for us?
/script DEFAULT_CHAT_FRAME:AddMessage("Need 102.4 combined avoidance. Currently at:",0.8,0.8,1)
/script DEFAULT_CHAT_FRAME:AddMessage(GetDodgeChance()+GetBlockChance() + GetParryChance() +5+(GetCombatRatingBonus(CR_DEFENSE_SKILL) + 20)*0.04,1,0.5,0)
I found this on one of my many RSS feeds Link
http://blessingofkings.blogspot.com/200 ... macro.html
It's very useful when trying to build a gear set when raid tanking. The only thing to note is that in the line:
(GetCombatRatingBonus(CR_DEFENSE_SKILL) + 20)
The + 20 assumes you have 5/5 Anticipation. If you don't, you have to change this line to reflect how much defense you are getting from Anticipation (0 - 20).
(Snagged from the WoW Paladin forums. Stuff like this makes wading through all the Ret/Holy sniping worthwhile.)
Edit: Added some spaces so the macro will wrap properly in Firefox. You may have to remove some spaces if it is over the macro character limit.
Edit: Changed GetCombatRating call to GetCombatRatingBonus call. Shortens the macro slightly.
Edit: Also, you have to activate Holy Shield before using this to get results with Holy Shield. Otherwise you'll look 30-35% worse than you really are.
/script DEFAULT_CHAT_FRAME:AddMessage("Need 102.4 combined avoidance. Currently at:",0.8,0.8,1)
/script DEFAULT_CHAT_FRAME:AddMessage(GetDodgeChance()+GetBlockChance() + GetParryChance() +5+(GetCombatRatingBonus(CR_DEFENSE_SKILL) + 20)*0.04,1,0.5,0)
I found this on one of my many RSS feeds Link
http://blessingofkings.blogspot.com/200 ... macro.html
It's very useful when trying to build a gear set when raid tanking. The only thing to note is that in the line:
(GetCombatRatingBonus(CR_DEFENSE_SKILL) + 20)
The + 20 assumes you have 5/5 Anticipation. If you don't, you have to change this line to reflect how much defense you are getting from Anticipation (0 - 20).
(Snagged from the WoW Paladin forums. Stuff like this makes wading through all the Ret/Holy sniping worthwhile.)
Edit: Added some spaces so the macro will wrap properly in Firefox. You may have to remove some spaces if it is over the macro character limit.
Edit: Changed GetCombatRating call to GetCombatRatingBonus call. Shortens the macro slightly.
Edit: Also, you have to activate Holy Shield before using this to get results with Holy Shield. Otherwise you'll look 30-35% worse than you really are.
- Darthpaxis
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:11 am
I snagged that from Coriel's "Blessing of Kings" blog the other day. It works. Just fire up Holy Shield, use the macro, it'll tell you where you're at.
I am the light that brings the dawn.
Something Wicked this way comes.
Formerly: Baelor of Runetotem-US (2006-2007) | Cathmor of Malfurion-US (2007-2010)
Follow me on Twitter
Something Wicked this way comes.
Formerly: Baelor of Runetotem-US (2006-2007) | Cathmor of Malfurion-US (2007-2010)
Follow me on Twitter
-

Baelor - Moderator
- Posts: 2672
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:42 am
- Location: New York
Cimzar wrote:Isn't that what TankPoints does, plus much much more?
Good, low overhead macro though.
TankPoints is still irreplaceable for the sheer amount of data it can give you for resist sets, and how much gear will sway your projected mitigation/avoidance, before you even put a single piece on.
Plus it's Ace. They're low overhead by design. :P
-

Prepared - Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:28 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
Prepared wrote:Cimzar wrote:Plus it's Ace. They're low overhead by design.
Shhh, don't go saying that too loud the Ace nay sayers will creep out of all the cracks and holes in the walls, floors and ceilings and take over the thread!
Dwarf Pali on Ner'Zhul
"Mostly Harmless"
"Mostly Harmless"
- corc
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 2:52 pm
corc wrote:Cimzar wrote:Plus it's Ace. They're low overhead by design.
Shhh, don't go saying that too loud the Ace nay sayers will creep out of all the cracks and holes in the walls, floors and ceilings and take over the thread!
Well it's low overhead assuming you have other Ace mods, if you don't then it's actually probably more, and I'm an Ace supporter.
Easy on the caps in the title please.
- Fridmarr
- Global Mod
- Posts: 9400
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:03 am
corc wrote:Prepared wrote:Plus it's Ace. They're low overhead by design.
Shhh, don't go saying that too loud the Ace nay sayers will creep out of all the cracks and holes in the walls, floors and ceilings and take over the thread!
IMMA CHARGIN MAH FLAMEBAIT
-

Sabindeus - Moderator
- Posts: 10321
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 9:24 am
Sabindeus wrote:corc wrote:Prepared wrote:Plus it's Ace. They're low overhead by design. :P
Shhh, don't go saying that too loud the Ace nay sayers will creep out of all the cracks and holes in the walls, floors and ceilings and take over the thread! :P
IMMA CHARGIN MAH FLAMEBAIT
/4chan
-

Prepared - Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:28 pm
- Location: Chicago, IL
Re: ARE You UNCRUSHABLE? FIND OUT THE EASY WAY!
Darthpaxis wrote:..snip!
GetParryChance() +5
..snip!
Now I'm a complete and utter newbie (beyond "For Dummies" books) at macros et al, but won't that skew your Parry rate?
Since Char Screen Parry includes the bonus granted from Deflection, no?
-

Livyan - Posts: 53
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:14 pm
- Location: Sweden-land
23 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to Advanced Theorycraft and Calculations
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest







