Remove Advertisements

LGBT rights discussion

Invisusira's playground

Moderators: Aergis, Invisusira

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Klaudandus » Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:36 am

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/t ... emacy-ever
'Gay Supremacy Is Becoming A Monster That Carries Greater Evils Than White Supremacy Ever Did'
*facedesk*
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11021
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Skye1013 » Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:00 pm

fuzzygeek wrote:
Fridmarr wrote:Draco, you may want to make peace with that, for your own sake. Unless the Democrats birth another media darling, she's the next president.


Don't you think she looks tired?

I'm happy to understand that reference :D
"me no gay, me friends gay, me no like you call me gay, you dumb dumb" -bldavis
"Here are the values that I stand for: I stand for honesty, equality, kindness, compassion, treating people the way you wanna be treated, and helping those in need. To me, those are traditional values. That’s what I stand for." -Ellen Degeneres
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." -Jon Stewart
Horde: Clopin Dylon Sharkbait Xiaman Metria Metapriest
Alliance: Schatze Aleks Deegee Baileyi Sotanaht Danfer Shazta Rawrsalot Roobyroo
User avatar
Skye1013
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3918
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:47 am
Location: JBPH-Hickam, Hawaii

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Skye1013 » Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:37 pm

"me no gay, me friends gay, me no like you call me gay, you dumb dumb" -bldavis
"Here are the values that I stand for: I stand for honesty, equality, kindness, compassion, treating people the way you wanna be treated, and helping those in need. To me, those are traditional values. That’s what I stand for." -Ellen Degeneres
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." -Jon Stewart
Horde: Clopin Dylon Sharkbait Xiaman Metria Metapriest
Alliance: Schatze Aleks Deegee Baileyi Sotanaht Danfer Shazta Rawrsalot Roobyroo
User avatar
Skye1013
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3918
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:47 am
Location: JBPH-Hickam, Hawaii

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Klaudandus » Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:47 pm

Skye1013 wrote:http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/04/28/afa-shops-who-display-we-dont-discriminate-stickers-are-bullying-christians/


Civil Rights are not a Zero Sum game! *facedesk*
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11021
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Sabindeus » Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:57 pm

Klaudandus wrote:
Skye1013 wrote:http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/04/28/afa-shops-who-display-we-dont-discriminate-stickers-are-bullying-christians/


Civil Rights are not a Zero Sum game! *facedesk*


Civil Rights are a zero sum game between the oppressors and those who are oppressed.
Image
Turn In, an NPC interaction automator - http://wow.curse.com/downloads/wow-addo ... rn-in.aspx
User avatar
Sabindeus
Moderator
 
Posts: 10470
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 9:24 am

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Klaudandus » Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:24 pm

Sabindeus wrote:
Klaudandus wrote:
Skye1013 wrote:http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/04/28/afa-shops-who-display-we-dont-discriminate-stickers-are-bullying-christians/


Civil Rights are not a Zero Sum game! *facedesk*


Civil Rights are a zero sum game between the oppressors and those who are oppressed.


Only in their minds.
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11021
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Koatanga » Wed Apr 30, 2014 8:03 pm

"They don’t want to hear that homosexuality is sinful behaviour – and they wish to silence Christians and the church who dare to believe this truth"

Imagine the gall of some people not wanting to hear hate speech. Furthermore, imagine the horrors of being oppressed by a sticker - an entire sticker - that proclaims a shop doesn't discriminate. Doesn't discriminate. Oh how can they even live in a community where discrimination is not the absolute rule! Lord help them.
Retired. Koatanga, Shapely, Sultry, Doominatrix of Greenstone - Dath'Remar
Koatanga
 
Posts: 1971
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:46 pm

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Skye1013 » Sat May 03, 2014 7:36 am

Was perusing reddit when I came across this little gem:

Unknown wrote:What you're missing here, though, is that homophobia and anti-lgbt attitudes aren't defined by the identity of the people in any given situation. You can't claim that homophobia only encompasses identified, open gay people called "fags" by people who KNOW they are gay online. Hurting people that straight people know are hurt by that word is only a part of why it is used as an insult.

In a broader sense, words like "pussy", "fag", "homo", "bitch", etc. are considered attached to negative qualities centered around femininity and weakness. Straight men (and a lot of gay ones, too) attach homosexuality directly to feminine weakness (among other things), and then use homophobic language to suggest another person shares those qualities. It doesn't much matter if they are actually gay or not, because that's not the point.

The point is to say that by extension of being read as queer, the individual being abused is weak, feminine, and deserving of abuse. That's the message being reinforced by normalizing the use of anti-gay slurs in casual conversation. It's just not straight people's place to tell us that "fag" doesn't mean anything anymore considering even when it's used without knowing the sexuality of the other person the word itself is used to evoke gay stereotypes.

Also, being gay and using fag isn't necessarily a bad thing, so long as you aren't hurting your fellow gay people when you do it by demonizing feminine men to suck up to straight people and show how super normal you are (which is something we see A LOT in this community).

"Fag" definitely has room to be reclaimed, BY US THOUGH, and honestly since I can't tell a gay person from a straight person in Tribunal and wouldn't be able to trust someone who identified as such in chat...it's better that nobody use it in the context of a game.

I applaud this person (the username was deleted, so no accreditation.)

The discussion thread in case you're interested.
"me no gay, me friends gay, me no like you call me gay, you dumb dumb" -bldavis
"Here are the values that I stand for: I stand for honesty, equality, kindness, compassion, treating people the way you wanna be treated, and helping those in need. To me, those are traditional values. That’s what I stand for." -Ellen Degeneres
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." -Jon Stewart
Horde: Clopin Dylon Sharkbait Xiaman Metria Metapriest
Alliance: Schatze Aleks Deegee Baileyi Sotanaht Danfer Shazta Rawrsalot Roobyroo
User avatar
Skye1013
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3918
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:47 am
Location: JBPH-Hickam, Hawaii

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Nooska » Sat May 03, 2014 12:46 pm

One of teh first things that came to mind is how slurs are very culturally limited.
"Fag" is (and has been for a long time) slang for a cigarette in most of britain.

As for "homo", I have a hard time calling that a slur anywhere, as it is hjust a shortened form of homo-sexual.

I also have a very hard time agreeing with either "fag" or "homo" being directed at feminine weakness (and to be fair, I think the quoted posted has some latent mysoginistic or mysophobic issues of his own)

That being said, I do agree with the point that words can be reclaimed, but not by a subgroup, reclamation has to be supported by people ouside a subgroup, with the lack of hurtful intent.

If I use the danish equivalent for fag (for instance), noone would likely think it a slur (ignoring the ability to make any word a slur by tone or context), since it has been relaimed by the male homosexual community - the reclaiming and restriction of words that have been used as slurs, though is doomed to fail - if a words usages ir restricted by the reclaimers "you can't call us this, we are the only ones that can" then the word hasn't been and won't be reclaimed.
On the other hand, if you reclaim a word and start using it and stating "I am not hurt by this word, you may use it about med too, because I selfidentify with this, and it makes me stronger", then the word stops being a slur in general usage, and just becomes a nomer.
Main Characters:
Nooska, Blood Elf BM/SV Hunter on Argent Dawn (EU)
Morosin, Bloody freezing orc death knight on Argent Dawn (EU)
Niisca, Shady forsaken "priest" on Argent Dawn (EU)

Keeper Emeritus of the BM hunters guide on Elitist Jerks and the wowhead version untill patch 5.3.
User avatar
Nooska
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:55 am

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Fivelives » Tue May 06, 2014 5:48 am

the reclaiming and restriction of words that have been used as slurs, though is doomed to fail - if a words usages ir restricted by the reclaimers "you can't call us this, we are the only ones that can" then the word hasn't been and won't be reclaimed.
On the other hand, if you reclaim a word and start using it and stating "I am not hurt by this word, you may use it about med too, because I selfidentify with this, and it makes me stronger", then the word stops being a slur in general usage, and just becomes a nomer.


So much this.
- I'm not Jesus, but I can turn water into Kool-Aid.
- A Sergeant in motion outranks an officer who doesn't know what the hell is going on.
- A demolitions specialist at a flat run outranks everybody.
User avatar
Fivelives
 
Posts: 3106
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:55 pm

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Brekkie » Tue May 13, 2014 12:24 am

Fivelives wrote:
the reclaiming and restriction of words that have been used as slurs, though is doomed to fail - if a words usages ir restricted by the reclaimers "you can't call us this, we are the only ones that can" then the word hasn't been and won't be reclaimed.
On the other hand, if you reclaim a word and start using it and stating "I am not hurt by this word, you may use it about med too, because I selfidentify with this, and it makes me stronger", then the word stops being a slur in general usage, and just becomes a nomer.


So much this.


Are there other examples of that kind of reclamation, other than the danish one you described?

I'm trying to think of any, and I'm coming up blank. I can't think of any hateful identifiers that actually have really shed their legacy of hate. I can't think of any racial slurs that simply became non-hateful common-usage in the way you are describing. The ones that are no longer used in a hateful way are ones that simply faded from use entirely. Are Native Americans running around referring to themselves casually as Redskins? Are italians referring to each other as Wops? Jews as Christ-killers?

I just don't see it.
I feel like this idea is probably not likely to really happen, and has undertones of "just get over it".
Theckhd wrote:big numbers are the in-game way of expressing that Brekkie's penis is huge.
Brekkie
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Skye1013 » Tue May 13, 2014 1:13 am

Brekkie wrote:Are there other examples of that kind of reclamation, other than the danish one you described?

I'm trying to think of any, and I'm coming up blank. I can't think of any hateful identifiers that actually have really shed their legacy of hate. I can't think of any racial slurs that simply became non-hateful common-usage in the way you are describing. The ones that are no longer used in a hateful way are ones that simply faded from use entirely. Are Native Americans running around referring to themselves casually as Redskins? Are italians referring to each other as Wops? Jews as Christ-killers?

I just don't see it.
I feel like this idea is probably not likely to really happen, and has undertones of "just get over it".

Good ideas aren't always realistic ideas...

That being said... in regards to the Native Americans/Redskins thing... do Native Americans take offense to that? With as PC as our nation tries to pretend that it is... it's amusing to think we have a major sports team called the Redskins (or... did last I checked, but I don't really keep up with sports) if they do. For that matter... my high school mascot is the "Indians" which isn't necessarily a hate identifier... but definitely a label that has stuck around primarily through ignorance.
"me no gay, me friends gay, me no like you call me gay, you dumb dumb" -bldavis
"Here are the values that I stand for: I stand for honesty, equality, kindness, compassion, treating people the way you wanna be treated, and helping those in need. To me, those are traditional values. That’s what I stand for." -Ellen Degeneres
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." -Jon Stewart
Horde: Clopin Dylon Sharkbait Xiaman Metria Metapriest
Alliance: Schatze Aleks Deegee Baileyi Sotanaht Danfer Shazta Rawrsalot Roobyroo
User avatar
Skye1013
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3918
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:47 am
Location: JBPH-Hickam, Hawaii

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Nooska » Tue May 13, 2014 3:15 am

Well, I don't know a LOT about slurs in the US, and of course it depends on the reasoning behind it, the listed example of "christ-killer", as example, I don't see being reclaimed - and not all slurs are wanted to be reclaimed, but the discussion came from discussion about reclaiming slurs be restricting them - that was what I was arguing against (not that slurs in general would be or should be reclaimed - that is an entirely different discussion).

But yeah, there are several other examples, mostly european (as I am european) - being slightly sick still and a little too busy for my own good right now, I can't name any off the top of my head (its made harder because they aren't actually slurs anymore), but I will grant that most of them are from withing the LGBT community.

One I do remember (though my info may be wrong) is the word "nigger" - from my understanding it is used quite freely within the black communities (at least someplaces?), though this would qualify as reclaiming by restriction (as I'm quite sure I, pasty as I am, would not get away with using it).
Main Characters:
Nooska, Blood Elf BM/SV Hunter on Argent Dawn (EU)
Morosin, Bloody freezing orc death knight on Argent Dawn (EU)
Niisca, Shady forsaken "priest" on Argent Dawn (EU)

Keeper Emeritus of the BM hunters guide on Elitist Jerks and the wowhead version untill patch 5.3.
User avatar
Nooska
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:55 am

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Klaudandus » Tue May 13, 2014 2:02 pm

The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11021
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: LGBT rights discussion

Postby Klaudandus » Fri May 16, 2014 1:51 pm

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... _ever.html

It can be surmised as: "Pocahontas married John Rolfe, therefore restricting marriage to male-female couples is constitutional" and yeah, that's pretty much their argument.

The worst part of this argument is that Virginia did pass anti-miscegenation laws, so it was illegal for native-americans to marry whites, unless you were a relative of Pocahontas, because she was a honorary whitey.

The "Pocahontas exception"[edit]
The Racial Integrity Act was subject to the "Pocahontas exception"—since many influential "First Families of Virginia" (FFV) claimed descent from Pocahontas, a daughter of the Powhatan, the legislature declared that a person could be considered white even if he or she had as much as one-sixteenth Indian ancestry.[11] By comparison, during the 19th century, the legislature had defined that a person with one-eighth or less African ancestry could be considered white. During the years of slavery in effect, white citizens of Virginia were less concerned with non-European ancestry than people had become by the early 20th century, more than 50 years after emancipation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_Int ... ception.22
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11021
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

PreviousNext

Return to Arkham Asylum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


Remove Advertisements

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 380 on Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest