Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for WoW
Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, PsiVen, Sabindeus, Aergis
50 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for WoW
Stumbled across this article today.
http://www.polygon.com/2013/8/23/465024 ... the-casual
http://www.polygon.com/2013/8/23/465024 ... the-casual
"For Blizzard it makes sense [to go free-to-play] at some point. But a lot of the risk is in making that transition. You her stories about developers going free-to-play and getting double the number of players, but you don't always know it works out that way and how long it stays that way. We really don't know what the rate is before people drop off and lose interest."
-
Arnock - Posts: 2818
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:36 pm
- Location: Everywhere and nowhere
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
earlier quote from Now Gamer
I've thought from the beginning that Titan would be F2P from the ground up, that's probably what the recent core redesign is about, them reaching the same point.
I definitely think that free-to-play MMOs will be around for a very long time. At some point it's possible that World of Warcraft could end up being free-to-play, but I do think there's always room for there to be subscription games.
I've thought from the beginning that Titan would be F2P from the ground up, that's probably what the recent core redesign is about, them reaching the same point.
We live in a society where people born on third base constantly try to steal second, yet we expect people born with two strikes against them to hit a homerun on the first pitch.
-
Flex - Posts: 4677
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:29 am
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
The thing is, going for F2P would surely bring a lot of new players (and possibly several old players back as well).
But it will also lower the quality of the average players (remember "lower level/rankings" of F2P games are plagued by trolls and kids).
It would also mean WoW would lose the Subscription income, so should have to gain that income (which is quite sustantial) from another source. Probably we'd start seeing stuff like Exp / Honor / VP / CP gain bonuses on the store for example.
But it will also lower the quality of the average players (remember "lower level/rankings" of F2P games are plagued by trolls and kids).
It would also mean WoW would lose the Subscription income, so should have to gain that income (which is quite sustantial) from another source. Probably we'd start seeing stuff like Exp / Honor / VP / CP gain bonuses on the store for example.
theckhd wrote:Fuck no, we've seen what you do to guilds. Just imagine what you could do to an entire country. Just visiting the US might be enough to make the southern states try to secede again.
halabar wrote:Noo.. you don't realize the problem. Worldie was to negative guild breaking energy like Bolvar is to the Scourge. If Worldie is removed, than someone must pick up that mantle, otherwise that negative guild breaking energy will run rampant, destroying all the servers.
-
Worldie - Global Mod
- Posts: 9205
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:49 pm
- Location: Italy
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
icalledit.gif
F2P business model and new expansion to be revealed at Blizzcon?
F2P business model and new expansion to be revealed at Blizzcon?
- Lieris
- Maintankadonor
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:49 am
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
Worldie wrote:The thing is, going for F2P would surely bring a lot of new players (and possibly several old players back as well).
I doubt the old players bit. Most people don't quit because of the cost. One of the biggest deterrents is the cost when you're first starting, but you quickly forget about it after you're already deeply involved. And it's not like the subscription costs have ever gone up (at least, not that I can recall).
I do agree that F2P will bring a whole new player base. And probably one you don't want since everyone's 8 year old children will be signing up.
-
Nikachelle - Maintankadonor
- Posts: 8421
- Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:39 am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
Yeah, you think LFG/R chat is obnoxious now, imagine what it'll be like with the LoL crowd signing up.
Fetzie | Protection/Holy Paladin | EU-Kazzak
Former Author of the TankSpot Protection Paladin Guide

Former Author of the TankSpot Protection Paladin Guide
Sagara wrote:You see, you need to *spread* the bun before you insert the hot dog.
bldavis wrote:we are trying to extend it as long as we can...it just never seems to last very long
-
Fetzie - Posts: 2093
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:43 am
- Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
I am willin to bet that Blizz has always been considering a F2P model cause it would be foolish not to at least consider all their options. However I don't think this means that WoW is goin F2P anytime soon. I don't believe that WoW is anywhere near low enough numbers that lossin subscriber money for F2P cash from a portion of a potentially increased player base is gonna be profitable enough for Blizz to suffer through the switch.
Hearthstone Arena Stats - (Old) 2014
Server: PVP US Barthilas, Horde - <Tribo>
Main: Keondra, Delver of the Vaults, Lvl 100 Combat/Subtlety Rogue
Server: PVE US Nagrand/Caelestrasz, Alliance - <Chivalry>
Main: Crusader Shamora, Lvl 100 Protection Paladin
Server: PVP US Barthilas, Horde - <Tribo>
Main: Keondra, Delver of the Vaults, Lvl 100 Combat/Subtlety Rogue
Server: PVE US Nagrand/Caelestrasz, Alliance - <Chivalry>
Main: Crusader Shamora, Lvl 100 Protection Paladin
-
Shamora - Posts: 1062
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:10 am
- Location: In your Imagination
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
Nikachelle wrote:I doubt the old players bit. Most people don't quit because of the cost. One of the biggest deterrents is the cost when you're first starting, but you quickly forget about it after you're already deeply involved. And it's not like the subscription costs have ever gone up (at least, not that I can recall).
What I meant with that was, that I think several old players who quit out of boredom would (at least, I would) consider coming back in super-casual manner, as once the game is free you really don't lose anything by playing once in a while.
theckhd wrote:Fuck no, we've seen what you do to guilds. Just imagine what you could do to an entire country. Just visiting the US might be enough to make the southern states try to secede again.
halabar wrote:Noo.. you don't realize the problem. Worldie was to negative guild breaking energy like Bolvar is to the Scourge. If Worldie is removed, than someone must pick up that mantle, otherwise that negative guild breaking energy will run rampant, destroying all the servers.
-
Worldie - Global Mod
- Posts: 9205
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:49 pm
- Location: Italy
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
They really need to get the desktop chat client running. We have people that quit some time ago that would hang out in chat, which would almost certainly lead to hanging out in game. It's the ties that bind.
-
fuzzygeek - Maintankadonor
- Posts: 3447
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:58 pm
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
It used to work well (I have a friend who had the beta test, and he could chat just fine from it, even though he coulnd't tell me what he was chatting with due to NDA at time).
Not sure why they removed it.
Not sure why they removed it.
theckhd wrote:Fuck no, we've seen what you do to guilds. Just imagine what you could do to an entire country. Just visiting the US might be enough to make the southern states try to secede again.
halabar wrote:Noo.. you don't realize the problem. Worldie was to negative guild breaking energy like Bolvar is to the Scourge. If Worldie is removed, than someone must pick up that mantle, otherwise that negative guild breaking energy will run rampant, destroying all the servers.
-
Worldie - Global Mod
- Posts: 9205
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:49 pm
- Location: Italy
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
It was disabled due to a bug they needed to fix and they never got round to implementing it again.
Fetzie | Protection/Holy Paladin | EU-Kazzak
Former Author of the TankSpot Protection Paladin Guide

Former Author of the TankSpot Protection Paladin Guide
Sagara wrote:You see, you need to *spread* the bun before you insert the hot dog.
bldavis wrote:we are trying to extend it as long as we can...it just never seems to last very long
-
Fetzie - Posts: 2093
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:43 am
- Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
They should go with a model similar to guild wars, where you pay for the base game and the expansions.
If they do something like that, it would be reason enough for me to start playing again.
If they do something like that, it would be reason enough for me to start playing again.
Give me blood
-
kenshin648 - Posts: 239
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:26 pm
- Location: Muradin
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
Remember that taking off the subscription is going to take off 7kk+13€ per month = 91 million euros per month of income.
That's not a small amount, and it has to come from something else. Losing 91 millions per month would mean having to dramatically reduce the people that work on WoW.
That's not a small amount, and it has to come from something else. Losing 91 millions per month would mean having to dramatically reduce the people that work on WoW.
theckhd wrote:Fuck no, we've seen what you do to guilds. Just imagine what you could do to an entire country. Just visiting the US might be enough to make the southern states try to secede again.
halabar wrote:Noo.. you don't realize the problem. Worldie was to negative guild breaking energy like Bolvar is to the Scourge. If Worldie is removed, than someone must pick up that mantle, otherwise that negative guild breaking energy will run rampant, destroying all the servers.
-
Worldie - Global Mod
- Posts: 9205
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:49 pm
- Location: Italy
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
That's not an exact figure, as a decent portion of the market doesn't go by subscription (Some (or all?) of the Asian market).
But yeah, with 7.7 million subscribers, that's a lot of guaranteed income. It will be pretty hard to attract so many new players who will invest so massively into the shop.
Of course they're considering their options, but I don't see them flipping the switch until the playerbase drops way lower than it currently is. Under 2 million at least, if not lower.
But yeah, with 7.7 million subscribers, that's a lot of guaranteed income. It will be pretty hard to attract so many new players who will invest so massively into the shop.
Of course they're considering their options, but I don't see them flipping the switch until the playerbase drops way lower than it currently is. Under 2 million at least, if not lower.
-
Thels - Posts: 1233
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:30 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
Asian market is still by subscription, just they pay per hour rather than per month as far as I know.
theckhd wrote:Fuck no, we've seen what you do to guilds. Just imagine what you could do to an entire country. Just visiting the US might be enough to make the southern states try to secede again.
halabar wrote:Noo.. you don't realize the problem. Worldie was to negative guild breaking energy like Bolvar is to the Scourge. If Worldie is removed, than someone must pick up that mantle, otherwise that negative guild breaking energy will run rampant, destroying all the servers.
-
Worldie - Global Mod
- Posts: 9205
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:49 pm
- Location: Italy
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
Pay per hour is not exactly a subscription, is it? If it is, then my English is failing on me again.
Either way, since they pay by hour and not as a fixed monthly fee, the end results will vary somewhat. It's not going to make a major difference, though.
Either way, since they pay by hour and not as a fixed monthly fee, the end results will vary somewhat. It's not going to make a major difference, though.
-
Thels - Posts: 1233
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:30 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
I wonder if there be a premium option that allows me to be segregated from the inevitable influx of braindead idiots that will plague this game if it happens.
-
Teranoid - Posts: 1639
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:56 pm
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
Worldie wrote:Remember that taking off the subscription is going to take off 7kk+13€ per month = 91 million euros per month of income.
That's not a small amount, and it has to come from something else. Losing 91 millions per month would mean having to dramatically reduce the people that work on WoW.
They are not making 91m a month on subscription money.
[insert explanation of Asian "subscription" models here and a note that buying any kind of game time whether it's one month, the full three months or just one hour in a given quarter counts as being a WoW subscriber]
- Lieris
- Maintankadonor
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:49 am
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
Teranoid wrote:I wonder if there be a premium option that allows me to be segregated from the inevitable influx of braindead idiots that will plague this game if it happens.
I don't think the subscription system has been insulating you from that. :p That ship sailed some time ago.
- Lieris
- Maintankadonor
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:49 am
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
Teranoid wrote:I wonder if there be a premium option that allows me to be segregated from the inevitable influx of braindead idiots that will plague this game if it happens.
It's called leaving general chat and only doing things with your guild.
-
fuzzygeek - Maintankadonor
- Posts: 3447
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:58 pm
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
Sadly if you have an actually active game life, you can't pester the guild everytime you want to do a 5 men or LFR 

theckhd wrote:Fuck no, we've seen what you do to guilds. Just imagine what you could do to an entire country. Just visiting the US might be enough to make the southern states try to secede again.
halabar wrote:Noo.. you don't realize the problem. Worldie was to negative guild breaking energy like Bolvar is to the Scourge. If Worldie is removed, than someone must pick up that mantle, otherwise that negative guild breaking energy will run rampant, destroying all the servers.
-
Worldie - Global Mod
- Posts: 9205
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:49 pm
- Location: Italy
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
I am looking forward to wielding the Sacred Coca Cola Can Mace of Menacing Vengeance that I bought from the Blizzard shop. Will go well with the red and white stripes on my Colgate Whitening Gel Shield of Tartar Protection.
All hail Corporate Sponsorship.
All hail Corporate Sponsorship.
- cdan
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:58 am
Re: Tom Chilton says Blizzard is considering a F2P model for
Lieris wrote:[insert explanation of Asian "subscription" models here and a note that buying any kind of game time whether it's one month, the full three months or just one hour in a given quarter counts as being a WoW subscriber]
They also need to have been logged in to the game within 30 days of the reporting date.
We live in a society where people born on third base constantly try to steal second, yet we expect people born with two strikes against them to hit a homerun on the first pitch.
-
Flex - Posts: 4677
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:29 am
50 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest