Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Invisusira's playground

Moderators: Aergis, Invisusira

Re: Election 2012

Postby Sagara » Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:28 pm

Shoju wrote:
Our country might have been better off if it were just intelligent people voting. There is nothing worse than a bunch of mean, hateful, uneducated morons. They are diabolical in how they can skewer the facts.



I like mine the best.


Nah. Nobody would win, since nobody would *vote*
When that day comes, seek all the light and wonder of this world, and fight.

Worldie wrote:I used to like it [mean] back on Sylvanas.

Queldan - EU Stormrage (H) - Good night, sweet prince.
User avatar
Sagara
 
Posts: 3272
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:04 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Election 2012

Postby Delphineas » Wed Oct 24, 2012 1:04 pm

That kind of pro-life argument amuses me. This from the same people/religion that bans contraceptives and condoms. It's like they forgot their own myth about a Virgin Mary!
Fan of angels and catgirls.
Current MMO: EVE
Delphineas
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:04 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Dantriges » Wed Oct 24, 2012 3:34 pm

I hope I don´t fan the flames but it´s something that I wondered about for some time whenever that issue comes up. I am not a US citizen so I am not so familiar with some parts of your political landscape. Who are these liberals and why do some people despise them so much? I know what the name is supposed to mean in general but no idea what the liberals in the US are like. Political factions differ a lot from country to country even if they share the same label.
Dantriges
 
Posts: 657
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:39 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Koatanga » Wed Oct 24, 2012 3:50 pm

Dantriges wrote:I hope I don´t fan the flames but it´s something that I wondered about for some time whenever that issue comes up. I am not a US citizen so I am not so familiar with some parts of your political landscape. Who are these liberals and why do some people despise them so much?

Depends on who's talking, but in general liberals = Democrats and conservatives = Republicans.

You'll find American politics to be riddled with logical fallacies. The basic idea here is to include Democrats within the larger "liberals" group so that you can horrify people with the socialistic agenda of "liberals" and imply those ideas are supported by the Democrats.

The same thing happens with the Republicans being lumped in with the conservatives. It's all fun and games.
Un-Retired. Ish. Koatanga, Shapely, Sultry of Greenstone - Dath'Remar
Koatanga
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:46 pm

Re: Election 2012

Postby Passionario » Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:10 pm

From my (admittedly remote and foreign) point of view, it's the Democrats who are conservative, since their proposed policies more or less align with the status quo.

Republicans, on other hand, appear to be downright reactionary, since quite of few of them would rather turn back time for a century or so.
If you are not the flame, you're the fuel.
User avatar
Passionario
 
Posts: 2247
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:52 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Koatanga » Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:45 pm

Republicans are generally in favour of big business and reducing the influence of the federal government. The government basically exists for defense and infrastructure support, and beyond that should let people live their lives without interference. They prefer a survival-of-the-fittest mentality, and probably represent more of a true democracy - let the majority decide what's right and what's wrong. This does tend to favour a more discriminatory society, however, because beliefs that go against the majority opinion tend to be suppressed. So they are conservative in the sense of "we don't want to establish new laws to protect people - the old ones are just fine".

The basic idea is you are who you are, and through your own efforts you will make your life what it will be.

Democrats tend to extend the government's role as protector beyond military defense, and into areas like health care, literacy, and social equality. Democrats seek to protect minority causes from being steamrolled by majority rule, and hence tend become the champions of human rights issues, particularly where a minority group or opinion is being suppressed by the majority. Rather than conserving the old ways, they want laws and programs to right wrongs and combat social injustice and inequality.

The basic idea is that all men need to have an equal opportunity to reach their potential without being held back by birth or circumstance.
Un-Retired. Ish. Koatanga, Shapely, Sultry of Greenstone - Dath'Remar
Koatanga
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:46 pm

Re: Election 2012

Postby Skye1013 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 5:06 pm

Malthrax wrote:Replace "women" with "liberals", and I agree 100%:
Our country might have been better off if it was just conservatives voting. There is nothing worse than a bunch of mean, hateful liberals. They are diabolical in how they can skewer a person.

Don't want liberals voting so we can have an idiot like Romney in the white house?

To be fair, I'm not supporting Obama. I fall under the camp of "almost anyone would be better than Romney."
"me no gay, me friends gay, me no like you call me gay, you dumb dumb" -bldavis
"Here are the values that I stand for: I stand for honesty, equality, kindness, compassion, treating people the way you wanna be treated, and helping those in need. To me, those are traditional values. That’s what I stand for." -Ellen Degeneres
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." -Jon Stewart
Horde: Clopin Dylon Sharkbait Xiaman Metria Metapriest
Alliance: Schatze Aleks Deegee Baileyi Sotanaht Danfer Shazta Rawrsalot Roobyroo
User avatar
Skye1013
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3532
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:47 am
Location: JBPH-Hickam, Hawaii

Re: Election 2012

Postby Aubade » Wed Oct 24, 2012 5:07 pm

Am I the only person getting sick and tired of all this crap about the consulate attack? Yes, It was sad that we lost a great ambassador and other americans. Wether or not it was a terrorist attack, exactly who did it etc. That's government military information. Exactly what they say on the first few days/weeks/months while they're still trying to figure out all the information, what the next steps are etc. Is most likely in any other situation to be classified information. We were informed of the attack, informed of the loss. That's all in an active situation that I would want to know. I don't need to know the details of an ACTIVE MILITARY SITUATION. And the politicizing of this whole thing is making me sick.
Image
- Awbade Level 85 Human Paladin - <Tsunami> Frostmourne - Retired.
Deliriously wrote:I prefer the, "Lonely Hand Approach" (trademark pending)
User avatar
Aubade
Moderator
 
Posts: 4030
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:51 am
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: Election 2012

Postby Klaudandus » Wed Oct 24, 2012 6:44 pm

Image
Image


Also, someone on twitter
"Dear Jesus.My wife and I can't make a baby. Can you please send someone to rape her?" #DesperateRepublicanPrayers
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 9350
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Election 2012

Postby Klaudandus » Wed Oct 24, 2012 7:10 pm

Aubade wrote:Am I the only person getting sick and tired of all this crap about the consulate attack? Yes, It was sad that we lost a great ambassador and other americans. Wether or not it was a terrorist attack, exactly who did it etc. That's government military information. Exactly what they say on the first few days/weeks/months while they're still trying to figure out all the information, what the next steps are etc. Is most likely in any other situation to be classified information. We were informed of the attack, informed of the loss. That's all in an active situation that I would want to know. I don't need to know the details of an ACTIVE MILITARY SITUATION. And the politicizing of this whole thing is making me sick.


What bothers me is republicans whitewashing their history...

1983: Bomb Blast At U.S. Embassy In Beirut Killed More Than 60, Including 17 Americans
1983: Car Bomb Damaged U.S. Embassy In Kuwait
1987: Car Bomb Exploded Outside U.S. Embassy In Italy
1990: Palestinian Guerrillas Attempted To Attack U.S. Embassy In Tel Aviv
1998: Terrorist Bombs Near U.S. Embassies In Kenya, Tanzania Injured More Than 1,000 And Killed More Than 60, Including Eight Americans (because its fair to throw in Clinton as well)
2002: U.S. Consulate In Karachi, Pakistan, Attacked; 10 Killed, 51 Injured
2004: U.S. Embassy Bombed In Uzbekistan
2004: Gunmen Stormed U.S. Consulate In Saudi Arabia
2006: Armed Men Attacked U.S. Embassy In Syria
2007: Grenade Launched Into U.S. Embassy In Athens
2008: Rioters Set Fire To U.S. Embassy In Serbia
2008: Ten People Killed In Bombings At U.S. Embassy In Yemen

Not saying criticism is not deserved regarding what happened at Benghazi, but republicans shouldn't be throwing stones while living in a glass house
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 9350
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Election 2012

Postby Torquemada » Wed Oct 24, 2012 7:19 pm

Fair is fair. Can we call the Fort Hood shooting a terrorist act now? It's been 3 years, and the victims and families are getting fucked because it isn't considered one by the government.
User avatar
Torquemada
 
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:00 am
Location: Virginia

Re: Election 2012

Postby Skye1013 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 7:36 pm

I think that largely depends... was he shooting up the place because of an affiliation with AQ and/or other terrorist groups, or was he just a disgruntled worker? If it's the latter... then do school shootings also qualify as acts of terrorism? I think it all comes down to "where to we draw the line?"
"me no gay, me friends gay, me no like you call me gay, you dumb dumb" -bldavis
"Here are the values that I stand for: I stand for honesty, equality, kindness, compassion, treating people the way you wanna be treated, and helping those in need. To me, those are traditional values. That’s what I stand for." -Ellen Degeneres
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." -Jon Stewart
Horde: Clopin Dylon Sharkbait Xiaman Metria Metapriest
Alliance: Schatze Aleks Deegee Baileyi Sotanaht Danfer Shazta Rawrsalot Roobyroo
User avatar
Skye1013
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3532
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:47 am
Location: JBPH-Hickam, Hawaii

Re: Election 2012

Postby Skye1013 » Wed Oct 24, 2012 10:39 pm

Stepping away from the upcoming US elections... this cracked article is awesome, though the title is arguable, based on your definition of "crazy."

Snake (and any other Brazilians), how do you like the elections down there?

http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/the- ... than-usas/
"me no gay, me friends gay, me no like you call me gay, you dumb dumb" -bldavis
"Here are the values that I stand for: I stand for honesty, equality, kindness, compassion, treating people the way you wanna be treated, and helping those in need. To me, those are traditional values. That’s what I stand for." -Ellen Degeneres
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." -Jon Stewart
Horde: Clopin Dylon Sharkbait Xiaman Metria Metapriest
Alliance: Schatze Aleks Deegee Baileyi Sotanaht Danfer Shazta Rawrsalot Roobyroo
User avatar
Skye1013
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3532
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:47 am
Location: JBPH-Hickam, Hawaii

Re: Election 2012

Postby Klaudandus » Fri Oct 26, 2012 1:47 pm

The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 9350
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Election 2012

Postby Shoju » Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:41 pm

Klaudandus wrote:http://whatever.scalzi.com/2012/10/25/a-fan-letter-to-certain-conservative-politicians/

This made me lol



I'm not sure why you LOL'd, but that is quite possibly the most fantastic piece I have read regarding the idiocy that is the Republican's "Year of Rape" that they have had this year.
User avatar
Shoju
 
Posts: 5068
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Klaudandus » Fri Oct 26, 2012 2:52 pm

I lol'd because it was that or feel impotent at the absurdity/ignorance/dissonance Republicans display when it comes to abortion...

And now I feel impotent... thanks for bringing me down back to earth, now I gotta go punch a republican to feel better.
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 9350
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Election 2012

Postby Shoju » Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:00 pm

Klaudandus wrote:I lol'd because it was that or feel impotent at the absurdity/ignorance/dissonance Republicans display when it comes to abortion...

And now I feel impotent... thanks for bringing me down back to earth, now I gotta go punch a republican to feel better.


Sorry, I didn't mean to make you feel bad, I just wasn't sure what the LOL was from, that maybe I was missing something. I applaud the writer. What a fantastic way to tie a bow on the topic, and put it into terms that are very easy to understand.
User avatar
Shoju
 
Posts: 5068
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Malthrax » Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:29 pm

Klaudandus wrote:... now I gotta go punch a republican to feel better.


You didn't punch him. Government punched him for you.


On a related note:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6G3nwhPuR4 I guess it proves the adage, "Once you've had Barack, you'll never go back".
User avatar
Malthrax
 
Posts: 481
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:23 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Melathys » Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:56 pm

Image
User avatar
Melathys
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:08 pm

Re: Election 2012

Postby Aubade » Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:59 pm

Maybe I'm Biased, but I saw that video and said okay, I see it as a good thing. He's still standing for the things he wanted 4 years ago, and doesn't feel satisfied with the current progress he's made in 4 years, and wants to keep doing them.
Image
- Awbade Level 85 Human Paladin - <Tsunami> Frostmourne - Retired.
Deliriously wrote:I prefer the, "Lonely Hand Approach" (trademark pending)
User avatar
Aubade
Moderator
 
Posts: 4030
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:51 am
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: Election 2012

Postby Melathys » Fri Oct 26, 2012 10:11 pm

thats exactly what my wife said "at least he's not flip flopping."
Image
User avatar
Melathys
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:08 pm

Re: Election 2012

Postby Lightbeard » Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:52 am

Skye1013 wrote:Stepping away from the upcoming US elections... this cracked article is awesome, though the title is arguable, based on your definition of "crazy."

Snake (and any other Brazilians), how do you like the elections down there?

http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/the- ... than-usas/


Lost it at "Elvis Didn't Die"
Image
User avatar
Lightbeard
 
Posts: 4602
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:03 pm

Re: Election 2012

Postby Delphineas » Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:20 am

I think I picked up on the tone of that rape article quick enough to not get too upset about it. But the comments...I made the mistake of being curious about a link. Rape babies for Romney gave me chills.
Fan of angels and catgirls.
Current MMO: EVE
Delphineas
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:04 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Brekkie » Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:52 am

Thalia wrote:"It bugged me that Romney mispronounced Pashtuns, the primary ethnic group in Afghanistan as "Pash-tons" (correct is "Pash-toons"). It's the kind of mistake that you would NEVER make if you had ever actually been briefed by an expert on the country. To those of us who have been-there-done-that, it made him look like he had based his Afghanistan ideas on reading the wikipedia page 10 minutes before the debate.
Obama, by contrast, pronounced Pakistan ("Pa-key-stan") correctly, which is rare for Americans."

Wow that is so nit-picky, what about when Obama kept calling people CORPSMEN...over and over again at a ceremony. I often mispronounce things...you should see how people look at me when I mispronounce MANGA...it's like they give me the laser eyes of death lol.

For those standards then Obama is the best at being "briefed" well enough to be able to do the important things like pronounce Pashtun correct.


I only brought it up because it is an indicator of the kind of people who are advising Romney on his Foreign Policy strategy. Specifically, people who sit in "think-tanks" and only know what they have read, but consider themselves to be self-declared "experts". Put another way; people who don't know what they are talking about.

It may seem nit-picky, but if you think about it, there are only two reasons to make that mistake:
1)Romney had only ever seen the word in print, never actually spoken in conversation (which would speak volumes).
2)He was repeating a mispronounciation used by whoever he had discussed Afghanistan strategy with (which, again, would speak volumes).

It's a basic mistake regarding fundamental knowledge about the topic. A topic that is incredibly important to any aspiring next President of the US.


Thalia wrote: Though explain why he insisted it was a video that sparked the attacks on the consulate? Obama is no foreign policy guru, he is Jimmy Carter all over again and he straight up lied about it, over and over, along with the rest of his administration.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-benghazi-emails-idUSBRE89N02C20121024

Reuters is not a right-wing news organization.


This is an incredibly frustrating topic for me.
The reason I have been silent on it for quite a while is because I struggle to find anything productive to say without having to resort to "Trust me, this is the way it is, but I can't tell you why."

The right has been totally mischaracterizing this entire situation to the point of it being almost completely unrecognizable to those of us who actually WORK in that field and know people who were at the attacked diplomatic missions. It's like the black hole of hatred for Obama is warping reality around it with it's sheer gravity. And there is very little that can be done in the iterim until the full Accountability Review Board investigation is released to correct misconceptions without potentially compromising sensitive information.

All I can do is, for the sake of my sanity if nothing else, implore everyone to try to use a little bit of critical thinking.

Take your Reuters article, for example.
What does this article ACTUALLY say? What are the facts?

The facts are that SOMEONE...
SOMEWHERE....
CLAIMING to be a representative of a certain terrorist organization...
(is he really? Just trying to look cool?)
claimed ON FACEBOOK...
that that terrorist organization was responsible...
(was it? maybe just trying to piggy-back off of the events to try and build up it's own prestige? What motivation would it have to only NOW claim responsibility, and to do so over Facebook of all places?)

All these assertions need to be vetted in order for the claim to hold any weight. The Reuters article doesn't even take a stance on the matter, merely reports that the claim was made.

Yet somehow you jumped from that to the President of the United States, his entire administration (not to mention ME), and our entire intelligence network, are ALL bald-faced liars.
You are giving the entire United States Government less weight in their integrity than some random foreigner on Facebook. That is an absolutely astonishing, extraordinary claim.


And that isn't even touching the fact that:
-The attack was motivated by the video
-The attack was a pre-planned operation executed by a terrorist organization
...are NOT mutually exclusive statements!

Republicans (and I don't hold them in any special censure for this, the Dems would probably do the same if the situation was reversed) have been so desperate to find something damning out of this situation in order to turn Obama into Jimmy Carter when the two aren't even remotely comparable that it's reached the point of getting rediculous.

So please, I beg you, just THINK before you jump to conclusions. Wait for the investigation report to conclude.

A good link:
http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/u ... Final1.pdf
Theckhd wrote:big numbers are the in-game way of expressing that Brekkie's penis is huge.
Brekkie
 
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: Election 2012

Postby Brekkie » Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:49 am

Image

Screw reality, my prejudice-induced fantasy that I just made up is so much better.
Theckhd wrote:big numbers are the in-game way of expressing that Brekkie's penis is huge.
Brekkie
 
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:44 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Arkham Asylum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 380 on Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest