Remove Advertisements

Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Invisusira's playground

Moderators: Aergis, Invisusira

Re: Election 2012

Postby Dantriges » Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:43 am

No native speaker so I refrained from commenting on that part. The timing is obviously bad, to meddle in such an affair in such a way and well the sentence sounds quite obnoxious to me but I am not sure if I understand that sentence right.
Dantriges
 
Posts: 1252
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:39 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Paxen » Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:47 am

Brekkie wrote:The statistic everyone quotes is that median full-time female pay is 77% of median full-time male pay.
But that is largely because some of the highest-paying fields like engineering, law, medicine, and finance are disproportionately populated by men, which throws off the median. Not because men and women are necessarily earning different amounts for the same equivalent job.


You're ignoring the effect that occupation seen as "women's work" see their pay drop over time. Teacher used to be a highly respected and highly paid profession, but after women have mostly taken over, where is the pay now?
Paxen
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:38 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Malthrax » Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:08 am

Darielle wrote:But I'm not from the US, so I have no idea if you have kooky laws that may or may not be region-specific that alter that. But do bear in mind that a lot of outrage over the statement is about the context/timing of it from what I understand of people making a fuss about it.


The context - he was referring back to something his father told him when he was a boy.

The timing - he said it about eight months ago, and it resurfaced recently as a result of partisan dirt-digging.

A state representative is drawing heat for saying that his father had told him when he was young that "some girls rape easy" as a way to warn him that a woman could agree to sex but then later claim that it wasn't consensual.

Freshman Rep. Roger Rivard (R-Rice Lake) in December [2011] discussed a case with the Chetek Alert newspaper in which a 17-year-old high school senior was charged with sexual assault for having sex with an underage girl in the school's band room.
- http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolit ... 87961.html


IF what he said was that damning, where was the nationwide outrage in December of last year?
Last edited by Malthrax on Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Malthrax
 
Posts: 727
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:23 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Klaudandus » Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:08 am

http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress ... n-20120711

Here, how women are paid as House and Senate staff. Those working for republicans earn a lot less than men in the same position. Yeah, dems also fall behind, but not as much as reps
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11060
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Election 2012

Postby Shoju » Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:38 am

Delphineas wrote:Am I the only one who ISN'T offended by Roger Rivard's "Some women rape so easy." comment? It sure seems so, or maybe I'm one of the few who read the context.
OTOH, I look at it more from the lens that women get raped, men enjoy it bullshit. I think this could be spun to showcase how women largely just have to say it's rape and it's rape, whereas there is social stigma against men admitting the same, and even no law against said acts.

Course, I have a strong sense of fair play, which has gotten me in trouble before.



I have a teenage son. One of his friends just found himself in this very type of situation. Never in my wildest dreams would I have said "Some Girls Rape Easy" when explaining it all to him. That's just a really shitty way to say something.

And then... He is now an old man. You should have the forethought to realize that if you say something stupid like "Some Girls Rape Easy" you are looking at a storm of idiocy.

You can say "Well, he's just quoting his even older father"

Sure he was. But we have progressed as a society. There are kinds of things that even my grandparents said that I certainly wouldn't repeat in front of a reporter while I'm running for public office. That's just dumb, like I said. I'm not saying that he was making light of rape, I'm saying that he should have chosen not to use such an obviously "old" statement.
User avatar
Shoju
 
Posts: 6349
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Shoju » Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:39 am

Shoju wrote:
Delphineas wrote:Am I the only one who ISN'T offended by Roger Rivard's "Some women rape so easy." comment? It sure seems so, or maybe I'm one of the few who read the context.
OTOH, I look at it more from the lens that women get raped, men enjoy it bullshit. I think this could be spun to showcase how women largely just have to say it's rape and it's rape, whereas there is social stigma against men admitting the same, and even no law against said acts.

Course, I have a strong sense of fair play, which has gotten me in trouble before.



I have a teenage son. One of his friends just found himself in this very type of situation. Never in my wildest dreams would I have said "Some Girls Rape Easy" when explaining it all to him. That's just a really shitty way to say something.

And then... He is now an old man. You should have the forethought to realize that if you say something stupid like "Some Girls Rape Easy" you are looking at a storm of idiocy.

You can say "Well, he's just quoting his even older father"

Sure he was. But we have progressed as a society. There are kinds of things that even my grandparents said that I certainly wouldn't repeat in front of a reporter while I'm running for public office. That's just dumb, like I said. I'm not saying that he was making light of rape, I'm saying that he should have chosen not to use such an obviously "old" statement.



IF what he said was that damning, where was the nationwide outrage in December of last year?


Because, as we learned with Romen Noodles' 47% comment, sometimes things are slow to propagate, even in the age of the interwebz.
User avatar
Shoju
 
Posts: 6349
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Brekkie » Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:53 pm

Paxen wrote:
Brekkie wrote:The statistic everyone quotes is that median full-time female pay is 77% of median full-time male pay.
But that is largely because some of the highest-paying fields like engineering, law, medicine, and finance are disproportionately populated by men, which throws off the median. Not because men and women are necessarily earning different amounts for the same equivalent job.


You're ignoring the effect that occupation seen as "women's work" see their pay drop over time. Teacher used to be a highly respected and highly paid profession, but after women have mostly taken over, where is the pay now?


I don't find convincing the idea that there is somehow CAUSATION here. I think that is highly questionable logic.

Klaudandus wrote:http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress-legacy/how-congressional-republicans-and-democrats-pay-women-20120711

Here, how women are paid as House and Senate staff. Those working for republicans earn a lot less than men in the same position. Yeah, dems also fall behind, but not as much as reps


This, however, is decent data.
I accept that there is clearly a discrepancy.
Theckhd wrote:big numbers are the in-game way of expressing that Brekkie's penis is huge.
Brekkie
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: Election 2012

Postby Paxen » Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:33 am

Brekkie wrote:I don't find convincing the idea that there is somehow CAUSATION here. I think that is highly questionable logic.


Why not? You just agreed that women working for congressmen do in fact get paid less for the exact same job as male staffers. Why would not the same effect work on teacher's salaries as the profession became more and more dominated by women?
Paxen
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:38 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Delphineas » Sat Oct 20, 2012 10:26 am

Paxen wrote:
Brekkie wrote:I don't find convincing the idea that there is somehow CAUSATION here. I think that is highly questionable logic.


Why not? You just agreed that women working for congressmen do in fact get paid less for the exact same job as male staffers. Why would not the same effect work on teacher's salaries as the profession became more and more dominated by women?

One is a snapshot. The other is 2 just points of data, without accounting for other possible factors.
Fan of angels and catgirls.
Current MMO: EVE
Delphineas
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:04 am

Re: Election 2012

Postby Skye1013 » Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:19 pm

Are male teachers getting paid more than female teachers? Or did the salary for teachers as a whole drop?
"me no gay, me friends gay, me no like you call me gay, you dumb dumb" -bldavis
"Here are the values that I stand for: I stand for honesty, equality, kindness, compassion, treating people the way you wanna be treated, and helping those in need. To me, those are traditional values. That’s what I stand for." -Ellen Degeneres
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." -Jon Stewart
Horde: Clopin Dylon Sharkbait Xiaman Metria Metapriest
Alliance: Schatze Aleks Deegee Baileyi Sotanaht Danfer Shazta Rawrsalot Roobyroo
User avatar
Skye1013
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3928
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:47 am
Location: JBPH-Hickam, Hawaii

Re: Election 2012

Postby Klaudandus » Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:33 pm

Since I work in the educational field, I'd say it has dropped across the board.

Raises are handed out across the board as well -- the only difference is seniority and special stipends given to teachers in certain positions, like master teacher or special education teacher.

the problem the educational field has, specially in texas, is budget cuts. our school district had its budget cut by 10 million two years ago... and texas is intent in cutting it again...
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11060
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Election 2012

Postby Klaudandus » Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:38 pm

Image
Image
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11060
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Election 2012

Postby Melathys » Sun Oct 21, 2012 1:11 am

Image
Image
User avatar
Melathys
 
Posts: 1910
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:08 pm

Re: Election 2012

Postby Aubade » Sun Oct 21, 2012 1:43 am

Got my Voter Pamphlet today in the mail!

Haven't read the candidates yet but read all of the iniatives/referendums on the WA Ballot today. Excited to see if our new Marijuana law goes through.

although the taxes set forth in the law are RIDICULOUS. 25% from grower -> Processor, 25% from Processor -> Retailer -> 25%(Plus 9.7% Sales tax) From Retailer -> consumer. And at a $3 a gram from grower->Processor, $6 a GRam from processor ->Retailer and $12 a gram retail price (estimated prices), the state is looking to make almost a billion dollars in the next 5 years, at the LOW end of the spectrum.
Image
- Awbade Level 85 Human Paladin - <Tsunami> Frostmourne - Retired.
Deliriously wrote:I prefer the, "Lonely Hand Approach" (trademark pending)
User avatar
Aubade
Moderator
 
Posts: 4877
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:51 am
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: Election 2012

Postby Brekkie » Sun Oct 21, 2012 5:56 am

I read an interesting article in the Economist yesterday about how the budget crisis amongst states has had the unintended consequence of social change due to loosening of regulations and restrictions.

Several states have allowed gambling and casinos in, in the hopes of added revenue. A couple have made fireworks legal, and a large number of previously "dry" states and counties have allowed the sale of alcohol, expanded it's sale to Sundays, increased the hours for sales, or privatized the state monopoly on booze. (That was one interesting thing I discovered; many states have had a monopoly on alcohol sales ever since the end of Prohibition!)
A couple states also have weed legalization on the ballot.

All of these have been driven by the desire to find ways to raise more revenue without raising income taxes. The hope is that more sales of more things will bring in increased sales tax.

Oddly enough, many of these initiatives are being specifically marketed to the state legislatures on the grounds of limited government and liberty, but have been previously (and even in many cases STILL) opposed by Republican-controlled state legislatures or governors because things like selling beer on a Sunday gives social conservatives the willies.
It took the scramble to find new revenue in order to push many of these deregulations through.
Theckhd wrote:big numbers are the in-game way of expressing that Brekkie's penis is huge.
Brekkie
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:44 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Arkham Asylum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


Remove Advertisements

Who is online

In total there are 2 users online :: 0 registered, 1 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 380 on Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest