A Call to Arms  Cataclysm Mechanics testing
Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, Aergis, theckhd
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Level 85 Human premade on the Raider's Dummy with only the weapon and shield equipped. 1021 AP, 331 SP.
I've uploaded my log, but a quick min/max/avg set of values seemed useful, assuming these are all uniform distributions. They're slightly off I guess, but I was only checking 1 ability at a time so I may have missed higher or lower values when I was doing other things.
http://www.worldoflogs.com/reports/5z65 ... details/6/
I've uploaded my log, but a quick min/max/avg set of values seemed useful, assuming these are all uniform distributions. They're slightly off I guess, but I was only checking 1 ability at a time so I may have missed higher or lower values when I was doing other things.
http://www.worldoflogs.com/reports/5z65 ... details/6/
 Code: Select all
min max avg
ShoR 1231 1231 1231
CS 1134 1817 1475
JoT 520 520 520
AS 3318 3892 3605
HW 2600 2601 2600
HoW 0
Exor 1298 1410 1354
SoT 167 240 203
SoR 57 57 57
SoJ 24 24 24
Cens 1002 1008 1005
Cons 1640 1650 1645
HotR 181 281 231
HaNova 713 970 841
Melee 601 951 776
Rasmfrackn
Dwarf Paladin
Icecrown Server
Eng/Scribe/Masochist
Dwarf Paladin
Icecrown Server
Eng/Scribe/Masochist

Rasmfrackn  Posts: 1014
 Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:11 pm
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Ok, so the first weird thing is that my model gives me 995 AP and 326 SP with just the weapon and shield equipped. So something is causing a discrepancy of 26 AP and 5 SP...
Could you post your base (naked) values when you get a chance? I'm guessing my base stats are wrong.
If I substitute your AP and SP, here's what I get:
ShoR, Judgement, AS, Exor, SoT, SoJ all seem fine. SoR is probably fine also, but I'll handcheck that to be sure. HW seems a bit low, it's only off by 4% but 100 damage is a decent discrepancy. CS, Censure, Consecration, HotR/HammerNova, and Melee are all off by a fair bit though.
Are you excluding glancing hits from the Melee calculations?
Could you post your base (naked) values when you get a chance? I'm guessing my base stats are wrong.
If I substitute your AP and SP, here's what I get:
 Code: Select all
Model Ras Diff Err%
ShoR 1225 1231 6 0
CS 1285 1476 191 15
JoT 520 520 0 0
AS 3615 3605 10 0
HW 2500 2601 101 4
HoW 1522 0 1522 100
Exor 1354 1354 0 0
SoT 199 204 5 3
SoR 53 57 4 8
SoJ 24 24 0 0
Cens 820 1005 185 23
Cons 409 1645 1236 302
HotR 340 231 109 32
HaNova 729 842 113 16
Melee 669 776 107 16
ShoR, Judgement, AS, Exor, SoT, SoJ all seem fine. SoR is probably fine also, but I'll handcheck that to be sure. HW seems a bit low, it's only off by 4% but 100 damage is a decent discrepancy. CS, Censure, Consecration, HotR/HammerNova, and Melee are all off by a fair bit though.
Are you excluding glancing hits from the Melee calculations?
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of GrehnSkipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty

theckhd  Moderator
 Posts: 7655
 Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
 Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
theckhd wrote:Could you post your base (naked) values when you get a chance? I'm guessing my base stats are wrong.
Holding mace/shield.
Wearing no gear.
Are you excluding glancing hits from the Melee calculations?
I did exclude glances, but I may not have seen the edges of the range in practice; that hammer has a huge damage range on it. My paperdoll damage range is 8491416 with mace/shield.
Rasmfrackn
Dwarf Paladin
Icecrown Server
Eng/Scribe/Masochist
Dwarf Paladin
Icecrown Server
Eng/Scribe/Masochist

Rasmfrackn  Posts: 1014
 Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:11 pm
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Thanks, I was still using the base values for level 80. I have the base human values updated now (though if anyone minds checking the base STR/STA/AGI/INT/SPI for a lvl 85 Dwarf, Draenei, BE, and Tauren I'd appreciate it).
Now my AP & SP values match your paper doll, so that's good.
The consecration data is really far off, would you mind repeating the Cons test naked or with a Dalaran Sword? That will tell me whether they gave it a base damage or whether they tweaked the SP/AP coefficients.
If you could retest Censure, HotR, CS, and melee at the same time, that would be good too.
Now my AP & SP values match your paper doll, so that's good.
The consecration data is really far off, would you mind repeating the Cons test naked or with a Dalaran Sword? That will tell me whether they gave it a base damage or whether they tweaked the SP/AP coefficients.
If you could retest Censure, HotR, CS, and melee at the same time, that would be good too.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of GrehnSkipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty

theckhd  Moderator
 Posts: 7655
 Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
 Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Aha, found the error for Crusader Strike, and likely for melee. stat_model was using the level 80 armor_c formula, which led to larger physical damage reduction than expected. Here's what I have now:
 Code: Select all
Model Ras Diff %Err
ShoR 1225 1231 6 0
CS 1483 1476 7 0
JoT 520 520 0 0
AS 3615 3605 10 0
HW 2500 2601 101 4
HoW 1522 0 1522 100
Exor 1354 1354 0 0
SoT 199 204 5 3
SoR 53 57 4 8
SoJ 24 24 0 0
Cens 820 1005 185 23
Cons 409 1645 1236 302
HotR 340 231 109 32
HaNova 729 842 113 16
Melee 772 776 4 1
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of GrehnSkipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty

theckhd  Moderator
 Posts: 7655
 Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
 Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
A total per cast value of 409 seems low for Consecration. Are you sure that's not a tick value?
~Arathor~
Arianne  80 Paladin  Protection
Arianne  80 Paladin  Protection
 Arianne
 Posts: 502
 Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:22 pm
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
I figured out what's happening with HotR. It's being mitigated like physical damage. Observe:
base=0.3*player.wdamage=340
mdf.phdmg=0.6818 (same as for CS, melee, etc)
0.3*player.wdamage*mdf.phdmg=231.7
It shows up as holy damage on WoL, does it show up like that in game? If so, I would assume this is an error in the coding of HotR ingame, and should probably be brought to Blizzard's attention.
Nope, it's too high for a tick value. The formula that I have is:
(8.*(0+0.027.*player.hsp+0.027.*player.ap))*mdf.HalGro
This differs from what's on mmochamp and wowhead only in the coefficients  mine are updated to a value announced in a previous patch (21.6% SP and AP). But neither of the formulas make sense:
For 1021 AP, 331 SP, we get
(8*(0+0.027*331 +0.027*1021))*1.4 = 409 total damage over 10 seconds
(8*(0+0.04*331 +0.04*1021))*1.4 = 606 damage over 10 seconds
None of that matches what he observed:
The ticks he observed were ~165, with one tick every second for a total of 10 ticks. That's a net damage of 1650, like he posted. The numbers from the tooltips and my formula are both too large to be ticks, but way too small to be total damage.
That probably means they added a base damage to the spell and the tooltips on wowhead/mmo haven't been properly updated. If the coefficients are 8*0.04=32% of sp and ap, the base damage is 1217. If the coefficients are 21.6%, the base damage is 1358. Once we know exactly what the scaling coefficients are, we'll be able to estimate the base damage and fix that portion of the code.
base=0.3*player.wdamage=340
mdf.phdmg=0.6818 (same as for CS, melee, etc)
0.3*player.wdamage*mdf.phdmg=231.7
It shows up as holy damage on WoL, does it show up like that in game? If so, I would assume this is an error in the coding of HotR ingame, and should probably be brought to Blizzard's attention.
Arianne wrote:A total per cast value of 409 seems low for Consecration. Are you sure that's not a tick value?
Nope, it's too high for a tick value. The formula that I have is:
(8.*(0+0.027.*player.hsp+0.027.*player.ap))*mdf.HalGro
This differs from what's on mmochamp and wowhead only in the coefficients  mine are updated to a value announced in a previous patch (21.6% SP and AP). But neither of the formulas make sense:
For 1021 AP, 331 SP, we get
(8*(0+0.027*331 +0.027*1021))*1.4 = 409 total damage over 10 seconds
(8*(0+0.04*331 +0.04*1021))*1.4 = 606 damage over 10 seconds
None of that matches what he observed:
 Code: Select all
[13:04:47.765] Rasmtwo casts Consecration
[13:04:48.765] Rasmtwo Consecration Raider's Training Dummy 166 (O: 1)
[13:04:49.968] Rasmtwo Consecration Raider's Training Dummy 166 (O: 1)
[13:04:50.718] Rasmtwo Consecration Raider's Training Dummy Miss
[13:04:51.984] Rasmtwo Consecration Raider's Training Dummy 165 (O: 1)
[13:04:52.796] Rasmtwo Consecration Raider's Training Dummy 165 (O: 1)
[13:04:54.000] Rasmtwo Consecration Raider's Training Dummy 166 (O: 1)
[13:04:54.796] Rasmtwo Consecration Raider's Training Dummy *247* (O: 1)
[13:04:55.812] Rasmtwo Consecration Raider's Training Dummy Miss
[13:04:56.812] Rasmtwo Consecration Raider's Training Dummy 165 (O: 1)
[13:04:57.828] Rasmtwo's Consecration fades
[13:04:58.015] Rasmtwo Consecration Raider's Training Dummy 165 (O: 1)
The ticks he observed were ~165, with one tick every second for a total of 10 ticks. That's a net damage of 1650, like he posted. The numbers from the tooltips and my formula are both too large to be ticks, but way too small to be total damage.
That probably means they added a base damage to the spell and the tooltips on wowhead/mmo haven't been properly updated. If the coefficients are 8*0.04=32% of sp and ap, the base damage is 1217. If the coefficients are 21.6%, the base damage is 1358. Once we know exactly what the scaling coefficients are, we'll be able to estimate the base damage and fix that portion of the code.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of GrehnSkipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty

theckhd  Moderator
 Posts: 7655
 Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
 Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Dwarf stats (I just lucked out and procced a race change.)
I'm logging with weapon + shield still, since I need them for CS and HotR. As a dwarf, my censure is definitely doing 168 per tick, with the occasional 169. I get 6 ticks after a refresh when I back off. Consecrate definitely ticks for 165.
Naked, consecrate is 142143 per tick, 10 ticks. Censure ticks for 9495.
I bought a Mace (item name, damage range 816, dps 6.5) and redid CS and HotR. CS is 144154, HotR is 1820 plus 660906 (I don't understand this range.. the tooltip doesn't even state a range, just a fixed #).
dwarf with premade mace/shield
dwarf with only a white mace with a 816 range
 Interesting... sometimes HotR just fails and doesn't show up in the log. I noticed when no numbers popped up, but it did seem odd somehow... now I realize that it wasn't popping up misses or anything either. Sometimes it just makes the sound and nothing happens.
I'm logging with weapon + shield still, since I need them for CS and HotR. As a dwarf, my censure is definitely doing 168 per tick, with the occasional 169. I get 6 ticks after a refresh when I back off. Consecrate definitely ticks for 165.
Naked, consecrate is 142143 per tick, 10 ticks. Censure ticks for 9495.
I bought a Mace (item name, damage range 816, dps 6.5) and redid CS and HotR. CS is 144154, HotR is 1820 plus 660906 (I don't understand this range.. the tooltip doesn't even state a range, just a fixed #).
dwarf with premade mace/shield
dwarf with only a white mace with a 816 range
 Interesting... sometimes HotR just fails and doesn't show up in the log. I noticed when no numbers popped up, but it did seem odd somehow... now I realize that it wasn't popping up misses or anything either. Sometimes it just makes the sound and nothing happens.
Last edited by Rasmfrackn on Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rasmfrackn
Dwarf Paladin
Icecrown Server
Eng/Scribe/Masochist
Dwarf Paladin
Icecrown Server
Eng/Scribe/Masochist

Rasmfrackn  Posts: 1014
 Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:11 pm
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Rasmfrackn wrote:I bought a Mace (item name, damage range 816, dps 6.5) and redid CS and HotR. CS is 144154, HotR is 1820 plus 660906 (I don't understand this range.. the tooltip doesn't even state a range, just a fixed #).
There's a checkbox in the interface options somewhere for putting averages instead of ranges on tooltips that I believe gets checked by default

Sabindeus  Moderator
 Posts: 10455
 Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 9:24 am
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Sabindeus wrote:There's a checkbox in the interface options somewhere for putting averages instead of ranges on tooltips that I believe gets checked by default
So there is. That's new... still has the ! by it and everything. Naked range on the HotR holy damage is 654 to 945. With only premade mace/shield, it goes to 703 to 994.
Oh, and to your question theck, HotR shows up as a small physical hit and an AE holy hit. In the combat log that is. The small hit is labeled physical, the nova is labeled holy.
Rasmfrackn
Dwarf Paladin
Icecrown Server
Eng/Scribe/Masochist
Dwarf Paladin
Icecrown Server
Eng/Scribe/Masochist

Rasmfrackn  Posts: 1014
 Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:11 pm
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Great. I haven't started looking at your dwarf data yet, but I will shortly.
Conclusions from human data:
Holy Wrath doesn't have much variability, it's coming out as 2501 base damage instead of 2401 at level 85. I can only assume that the base damage was buffed by 100, since the SP scaling was pretty clearly laid out by a blue post a little while back.
I can't figure out what's up with the HammerNova damage. There are no other modifiers to buff it, so we're pretty much looking at a damage range issue. Either both max and min were buffed, or the min was increased to reduce the variability. I should be able to figure it out from the Dwarf data.
Consecrate is almost certainly a base damage problem; again, the Dwarf data should clear that up.
I didn't see any Censure data in your Human parse, and given what you've said about the Dwarf data, I'm inclined to write that off to human error. I get ticks of about 165 with my model, but your human data is suggesting ticks of over 200. The dwarf data looks to be right around the model.
I'll hopefully get a chance to scrutinize the Dwarf data in an hour or so.
Conclusions from human data:
Holy Wrath doesn't have much variability, it's coming out as 2501 base damage instead of 2401 at level 85. I can only assume that the base damage was buffed by 100, since the SP scaling was pretty clearly laid out by a blue post a little while back.
I can't figure out what's up with the HammerNova damage. There are no other modifiers to buff it, so we're pretty much looking at a damage range issue. Either both max and min were buffed, or the min was increased to reduce the variability. I should be able to figure it out from the Dwarf data.
Consecrate is almost certainly a base damage problem; again, the Dwarf data should clear that up.
I didn't see any Censure data in your Human parse, and given what you've said about the Dwarf data, I'm inclined to write that off to human error. I get ticks of about 165 with my model, but your human data is suggesting ticks of over 200. The dwarf data looks to be right around the model.
I'll hopefully get a chance to scrutinize the Dwarf data in an hour or so.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of GrehnSkipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty

theckhd  Moderator
 Posts: 7655
 Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
 Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
theckhd wrote:I didn't see any Censure data in your Human parse, and given what you've said about the Dwarf data, I'm inclined to write that off to human error. I get ticks of about 165 with my model, but your human data is suggesting ticks of over 200. The dwarf data looks to be right around the model.
I'll hopefully get a chance to scrutinize the Dwarf data in an hour or so.
Hmm... maybe there was a miscommunication in # of ticks? For my human numbers, I have 167 * 6 as the total damage for censure once i stop attacking. It ticks 6 times, not 5, so maybe that's the confusion. It was definitely 167 for human.
Rasmfrackn
Dwarf Paladin
Icecrown Server
Eng/Scribe/Masochist
Dwarf Paladin
Icecrown Server
Eng/Scribe/Masochist

Rasmfrackn  Posts: 1014
 Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:11 pm
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Rasmfrackn wrote:theckhd wrote:I didn't see any Censure data in your Human parse, and given what you've said about the Dwarf data, I'm inclined to write that off to human error. I get ticks of about 165 with my model, but your human data is suggesting ticks of over 200. The dwarf data looks to be right around the model.
I'll hopefully get a chance to scrutinize the Dwarf data in an hour or so.
Hmm... maybe there was a miscommunication in # of ticks? For my human numbers, I have 167 * 6 as the total damage for censure once i stop attacking. It ticks 6 times, not 5, so maybe that's the confusion. It was definitely 167 for human.
You're getting 6 ticks when you disengage because the DoT is present already. But it's only 5 ticks every 15 seconds in the steadystate.
Ex: T=tick,  is a one second wait
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
The underlined portion is what happens in 15 seconds. If you include the bolded tick right before the underline in the final section, then you're essentially including the 3second period that precedes it. Otherwise you're putting 6 ticks in one 15second period and 4 ticks in the one before it.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of GrehnSkipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty

theckhd  Moderator
 Posts: 7655
 Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
 Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Consecration
Dwarf Data:
Sanity check: Censure's scaling is (0.013*sp+0.025*ap)*5*1.12 (5 stacks, 1.12 for SotP). It's easy to verify that these AP and SP values give you exactly what's observed in the Tick column for censure. Thus, we feel confident that our AP and SP numbers are right and that our Censure model is right.
If we assume the model for Consecration is 8*(base+c*(ap+sp))*1.4 (HG talent), we can determine the coefficient c by dividing the total damage difference by the sum of the ap and sp differences. I.e.
8*1.4*c=(diff_damage)/(diff_ap+diff_sp) = 22.5*10/(458+137) = 0.3782
c=0.0338
This is somewhere between the tooltip value of 0.04 and the old value of 0.027.
To determine the base value, we can solve the model equation for base and plug in the AP and SP values for the different gear sets:
tick*10=8*1.4*(base+c*(ap+sp))
base=tick*10/(8*1.4)c*(ap+sp)
plugging in values for tick, c, ap, and sp, we get base=101.2 for both gear sets. So even at 0 ap and sp, Consecration will do about 1133 damage. Since both sets come out to about the same value, we can feel reasonably certain that the model is correct. It's still possible that the scaling with SP and AP use different coefficients, because our AP and SP gains are always proportional in this test. A simple check with an INT or SP trinket should be enough to clarify this detail though.
So the raw damage of Consecrate=8*(101.2+0.0338*(sp+ap))*(1+0.2*points_in_hallowed_ground)
Dwarf Data:
 Code: Select all
Tick
Gear AP SP Cons Cens
Naked 573 196 142.5 94.5
Prem 1031 333 165 168
diff 458 137 22.5 73.5
Sanity check: Censure's scaling is (0.013*sp+0.025*ap)*5*1.12 (5 stacks, 1.12 for SotP). It's easy to verify that these AP and SP values give you exactly what's observed in the Tick column for censure. Thus, we feel confident that our AP and SP numbers are right and that our Censure model is right.
If we assume the model for Consecration is 8*(base+c*(ap+sp))*1.4 (HG talent), we can determine the coefficient c by dividing the total damage difference by the sum of the ap and sp differences. I.e.
8*1.4*c=(diff_damage)/(diff_ap+diff_sp) = 22.5*10/(458+137) = 0.3782
c=0.0338
This is somewhere between the tooltip value of 0.04 and the old value of 0.027.
To determine the base value, we can solve the model equation for base and plug in the AP and SP values for the different gear sets:
tick*10=8*1.4*(base+c*(ap+sp))
base=tick*10/(8*1.4)c*(ap+sp)
plugging in values for tick, c, ap, and sp, we get base=101.2 for both gear sets. So even at 0 ap and sp, Consecration will do about 1133 damage. Since both sets come out to about the same value, we can feel reasonably certain that the model is correct. It's still possible that the scaling with SP and AP use different coefficients, because our AP and SP gains are always proportional in this test. A simple check with an INT or SP trinket should be enough to clarify this detail though.
So the raw damage of Consecrate=8*(101.2+0.0338*(sp+ap))*(1+0.2*points_in_hallowed_ground)
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of GrehnSkipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty

theckhd  Moderator
 Posts: 7655
 Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
 Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: A call to arms  Beta/PTR parses on WoL
HammerNova
We don't have quite enough data points here to solve the generic model. It's clear from the data that it's gained some sort of scaling coefficient, probably based on SP and AP (though it could use weapon damage for all we know).
If we assume a general form of base+c1*ap+c2*sp, we have three unknowns: base, c1, and c2. To solve that system in three variables, we need 3 equations; unfortunately, we only have two: one from the naked set, one from the premade sword/shield set.
If we assume that c1=c2, we can solve the system and find that c=0.0824 and base=590.6881.6. But that's only if the underlying assumption of c1=c2 is true. If we get another data point with a different value of AP and SP (maybe via a trinket or ring  a nonSTR AP or SP gain would be ideal since it would decouple ap and sp), we can figure out the coefficients.
<edit>Just as a sanity check, I tried using the max base damage from the tooltip (874) to see if it made sense. That gives us the following system of equations, in matrix form:
Solving that gives us c1=0.0109 and c2=0.3942. At first this looks like nonsense, but note that 333/196*71=120.6. In other words, subtracting 333/196 times the first equation from the second, and assuming that 120.6 should be rounded down to 120 to account for rounding error, we get:
(1031974)*c1+0*c2=0
c1=0
In other words, if the tooltip max damage is correct, the damage doesn't scale at all with AP. That would mean that all 49 of the extra damage is due to spellpower, making c2=(12071)/(333196)=49/137=0.3577.
Checking this against the min damages seems consistent: 584+196*0.3577=654, and 584+333*0.3577=703. I'd like to get a few more data points to confirm this (again, a nonSTR increase to AP or SP would help cement the model), but at least tentatively it looks like HotR does tooltip damage that scales with SP but not with AP.
We don't have quite enough data points here to solve the generic model. It's clear from the data that it's gained some sort of scaling coefficient, probably based on SP and AP (though it could use weapon damage for all we know).
If we assume a general form of base+c1*ap+c2*sp, we have three unknowns: base, c1, and c2. To solve that system in three variables, we need 3 equations; unfortunately, we only have two: one from the naked set, one from the premade sword/shield set.
If we assume that c1=c2, we can solve the system and find that c=0.0824 and base=590.6881.6. But that's only if the underlying assumption of c1=c2 is true. If we get another data point with a different value of AP and SP (maybe via a trinket or ring  a nonSTR AP or SP gain would be ideal since it would decouple ap and sp), we can figure out the coefficients.
<edit>Just as a sanity check, I tried using the max base damage from the tooltip (874) to see if it made sense. That gives us the following system of equations, in matrix form:
 Code: Select all
 573 196 945874   573 196 71
1031 333 994874  = 1031 333 120
Solving that gives us c1=0.0109 and c2=0.3942. At first this looks like nonsense, but note that 333/196*71=120.6. In other words, subtracting 333/196 times the first equation from the second, and assuming that 120.6 should be rounded down to 120 to account for rounding error, we get:
(1031974)*c1+0*c2=0
c1=0
In other words, if the tooltip max damage is correct, the damage doesn't scale at all with AP. That would mean that all 49 of the extra damage is due to spellpower, making c2=(12071)/(333196)=49/137=0.3577.
Checking this against the min damages seems consistent: 584+196*0.3577=654, and 584+333*0.3577=703. I'd like to get a few more data points to confirm this (again, a nonSTR increase to AP or SP would help cement the model), but at least tentatively it looks like HotR does tooltip damage that scales with SP but not with AP.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of GrehnSkipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty

theckhd  Moderator
 Posts: 7655
 Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
 Location: Harrisburg, PA
Return to Advanced Theorycraft and Calculations
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest