A Call to Arms - Cataclysm Mechanics testing
Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, Aergis, theckhd
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Excellent work, Marble. Thanks.
EDIT :
Both of them can be easily tested on PTR :
I. 8% physical hit, attacking a boss-level dummy.
II. 8% physical hit, casting AS on a boss-level dummy.
Additionally, the "jumps" must also be tested. Therefore one needs to pick a boss-level dummy that has in proximity one or more lower lvl dummies. Having 0% hit, check misses on primary target (boss-level) vs hit/miss on secondary targets.
EDIT :
Marblehead wrote:
- Seal of Justice: It seems that SoJ's damage is on the spell attack table. It can miss and crit (no dodge or parry).
- Avenger's Shield on 2 targets, Holy Wrath on 1/2/3/4 targets & Consecration: They're all probably on the spell attack table. Consecration can crit and miss any of the ticks.
Both of them can be easily tested on PTR :
I. 8% physical hit, attacking a boss-level dummy.
II. 8% physical hit, casting AS on a boss-level dummy.
Additionally, the "jumps" must also be tested. Therefore one needs to pick a boss-level dummy that has in proximity one or more lower lvl dummies. Having 0% hit, check misses on primary target (boss-level) vs hit/miss on secondary targets.
Last edited by tlitp on Fri Sep 24, 2010 11:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-

tlitp - Posts: 554
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Marblehead wrote: Censure is apparently on the melee attack table and it can miss/dodge/parry on refresh. The ticks always do damage and can crit.
I'm pretty sure what you're seeing there is Censure applications missing. A few of the logs I scrutinized earlier followed this pattern as well - the only miss/dodge/parry entries for Censure occurred with other abilities, in-between the regular 3-second ticks.
Marblehead wrote:Judgement of Truth while melee-ing (full Censure): Judgement procs SoT (as stated before).[/url]
Was this with or without being specced into JotJ?
Marblehead wrote:Vindication can miss.
This is probably on the spell hit table, but it might be worth checking that down the line to make sure. For now it's a low-priority question.
Marblehead wrote:SotR is on the melee attack table and when it doesn't connect, it resets Holy Power to 1. That means that missing a 1-HoPo SotR doesn't consume any Holy Power, while missing a 2-HoPo or 3 HoPo SotR, it consumes 1 and 2 Holy Power respectively.
Flex posted a video earlier of different behavior - he was retaining all Holy Power when SotR missed, even if he had 3 going into it. Maybe this is a difference between beta and PTR though.
Marblehead wrote:Avenger's Shield on 2 targets, Holy Wrath on 1/2/3/4 targets & Consecration:[/url][/b] They're all probably on the spell attack table. Consecration can crit and miss any of the ticks.
Avenger's Shield is probably still coded as a ranged attack (like Judgement), which can miss but not be dodged/parried. I'm not sure if the secondary targets are the same way, but I doubt they're any different.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7467
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Heh, two wolves on the same sheep. 
-

tlitp - Posts: 554
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
tlitp wrote:Heh, two wolves on the same sheep.
According to his avatar, we're actually hunting wabbits.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7467
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Just to clarify, all the parses were on the boss level dummy. AS, HW and Cons consequent targets were the nearby lvl 80 and lvl 70 dummies.
Maybe my wording wasn't the best, but that's what I was trying to say. I thought it was clear by saying "Censure ticks always hit", that the previous sentence was referring to the Censure applications/refreshes.
I was specced into JotJ.
Checking the Vindication miss rates on the CS and HotR parses, after casting 172 successful CS + HotR, there were 31 Vindication misses or 18% miss rate.
I know. I've seen Flex' video, but what I observed was different. I haven't researched further, but the reason you gave seems pretty logical to me.
The reason I said that it's on the spell table is cause it doesn't proc SoT or SoR. If I understand the mechanics correct, SoR and SoT procs happen from attacks on the melee table (swings, CS, HotR, SotR) and attacks on the ranged table (Judge, HoR). So any other ability that doesn't proc them it should be on the spell table, right?
theckhd wrote:I'm pretty sure what you're seeing there is Censure applications missing. A few of the logs I scrutinized earlier followed this pattern as well - the only miss/dodge/parry entries for Censure occurred with other abilities, in-between the regular 3-second ticks.
Maybe my wording wasn't the best, but that's what I was trying to say. I thought it was clear by saying "Censure ticks always hit", that the previous sentence was referring to the Censure applications/refreshes.
theckhd wrote:Was this with or without being specced into JotJ?
Marblehead wrote:Spec - 0/31/10 (glyphs included)
I was specced into JotJ.
theckhd wrote:This is probably on the spell hit table, but it might be worth checking that down the line to make sure. For now it's a low-priority question.
Checking the Vindication miss rates on the CS and HotR parses, after casting 172 successful CS + HotR, there were 31 Vindication misses or 18% miss rate.
theckhd wrote:Flex posted a video earlier of different behavior - he was retaining all Holy Power when SotR missed, even if he had 3 going into it. Maybe this is a difference between beta and PTR though.
I know. I've seen Flex' video, but what I observed was different. I haven't researched further, but the reason you gave seems pretty logical to me.
theckhd wrote:Avenger's Shield is probably still coded as a ranged attack (like Judgement), which can miss but not be dodged/parried. I'm not sure if the secondary targets are the same way, but I doubt they're any different.
The reason I said that it's on the spell table is cause it doesn't proc SoT or SoR. If I understand the mechanics correct, SoR and SoT procs happen from attacks on the melee table (swings, CS, HotR, SotR) and attacks on the ranged table (Judge, HoR). So any other ability that doesn't proc them it should be on the spell table, right?
-

Marblehead - Posts: 202
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:28 pm
- Location: Bloodhoof (EU)
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
At 0 exp/8 phys_hit, in 50 AS casts :
- ~9*10^(-3) probability of getting no misses (if on spell hit table)
- ~10^(-5) probability of getting no dodge/parry events (if on ranged physical table)
-

tlitp - Posts: 554
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
I believe currently the PTR is a one released build ahead of the beta servers. That hopefully means that the behavior Flex reported is the intended behavior. In all likelihood it's supposed to work in a way similar to Templar's Verdict: on a miss you lose one unit of Holy Power.Marblehead wrote:theckhd wrote:Flex posted a video earlier of different behavior - he was retaining all Holy Power when SotR missed, even if he had 3 going into it. Maybe this is a difference between beta and PTR though.
I know. I've seen Flex' video, but what I observed was different. I haven't researched further, but the reason you gave seems pretty logical to me.

-

Chicken - Posts: 1597
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:19 pm
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
I have been uploading logs as I level.
If that is not the type of data you want, please let me know.

If that is not the type of data you want, please let me know.
- Neziah
- Maintankadonor
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 9:46 am
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Marblehead wrote:Maybe my wording wasn't the best, but that's what I was trying to say. I thought it was clear by saying "Censure ticks always hit", that the previous sentence was referring to the Censure applications/refreshes.theckhd wrote:Was this with or without being specced into JotJ?Marblehead wrote:Spec - 0/31/10 (glyphs included)
I was specced into JotJ.
I was posting while sleepy and raiding, so pardon me for a few of the redundant questions.
Marblehead wrote:theckhd wrote:This is probably on the spell hit table, but it might be worth checking that down the line to make sure. For now it's a low-priority question.
Checking the Vindication miss rates on the CS and HotR parses, after casting 172 successful CS + HotR, there were 31 Vindication misses or 18% miss rate.
Yup, that certainly suggests it's spell miss.
Marblehead wrote:theckhd wrote:Avenger's Shield is probably still coded as a ranged attack (like Judgement), which can miss but not be dodged/parried. I'm not sure if the secondary targets are the same way, but I doubt they're any different.
The reason I said that it's on the spell table is cause it doesn't proc SoT or SoR. If I understand the mechanics correct, SoR and SoT procs happen from attacks on the melee table (swings, CS, HotR, SotR) and attacks on the ranged table (Judge, HoR). So any other ability that doesn't proc them it should be on the spell table, right?
Not quite. 'Melee' attacks trigger seal procs. In general, 'ranged' attacks like Judgement, HoW, and AS don't. The reason we see procs from Judgement on live is because of JotJ, which is why I asked - the application of the JotJ debuff is treated like a melee attack.
Note that individual attacks can be coded specifically to cause or not cause seal procs. In essence, each ability has a "procs seals" flag coded into it. The default behavior of this flag is 'true' for melee attacks, and 'false' for ranged attacks, but there's no reason that Blizzard can't set the flag for individual abilities as they see fit.
HoR doesn't cause procs on live, but it was doing so on the beta for a while - presumably they recoded it as a melee attack before they decided to give tanks 6% spell hit with their spec.
Similarly, there was a period where Judgement caused seal procs, and with JotJ we were getting 2 procs per Judgement. Then they hotfixed it (or patched it, I forget), and the base spell no longer caused SoV/SoC procs (though we were still getting them from JotJ). Interestingly, we still get 2 SoR procs from each Judgement on live, which indicates that their code allows them to enable or disable each seal independently. Presumably, they made an oversight when hotfixing it and forgot to disable SoR on Judgement.
Also note that beyond seal procs, melee/ranged abilities have some other differences from spell abilities. The most obvious of which is that melee/ranged crit for double damage, while spell crit for 1.5x. If AS crits for double damage, that's further evidence that it's a ranged ability.
Given all of that, it's likely that:
1) JotJ still causes a seal proc (test as Ret or untalented to see if the proc goes away to prove)
2) AS and HoW are coded as ranged abilities (get to 8% hit and observe a miss to disprove)
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7467
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Ok, I understand. More testing to come.
On a side note, HoR still causes seal procs on beta.
On a side note, HoR still causes seal procs on beta.
-

Marblehead - Posts: 202
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:28 pm
- Location: Bloodhoof (EU)
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Chicken wrote:Marblehead wrote:
theckhd wrote:
Flex posted a video earlier of different behavior - he was retaining all Holy Power when SotR missed, even if he had 3 going into it. Maybe this is a difference between beta and PTR though.
I know. I've seen Flex' video, but what I observed was different. I haven't researched further, but the reason you gave seems pretty logical to me.
Wasn't sure if this was the best thread to mention this but...
One thing I noticed on the PTR, while like you said, you keep your Holy Power if SotR misses, you lose your Sacred Duty proc, which seems like it would make missing an even bigger threat loss.
- Shathus
- Maintankadonor
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:02 pm
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Marblehead wrote:On a side note, HoR still causes seal procs on beta.
I've only seen it proc Seal of Righteousness.
- KysenMurrin
- Posts: 6048
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:37 am
- Location: UK
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
KysenMurrin wrote:Marblehead wrote:On a side note, HoR still causes seal procs on beta.
I've only seen it proc Seal of Righteousness.
It won't proc SoT if there aren't any Censure stacks on the target. That's also why the first swing on a target only applies Censure without causing a SoT proc. Neither Judgement will proc SoT if there aren't any Censure stacks. It happens because the proc damage is dependent on the amount of the stacks, meaning that with 0 stacks it will get multiplied with 0, resulting in 0 damage (no proc).
-

Marblehead - Posts: 202
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:28 pm
- Location: Bloodhoof (EU)
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
I need some people to test my ability model implementation to confirm these average damage values against a boss-level (88) target dummy:
All damage values are against a single target. Cons damage is total per cast, Censure is a 5 stack over 15 seconds (ticks should be 20% of that). Judgement also assumes a 5-stack of Censure present on the target.
The setup is a 0/38/0 spec, no glyphs, no buffs, and naked except for the premade tanking weapon and shield (Mace of the Gullet and Bulwark of the Primordial Mound, no gems or enchants). Anyone with beta access who can create a premade can carry out this test, so it would help if a few different people took data for consistency checking. Please mention what your player stats are (AP, SP primarily) and make sure that you're not hitting a dummy that someone else is debuffing.
I'll be posting a similar request for level 80 values shortly, though obviously with a different spec and gear.
- Code: Select all
ShoR 1194
CS 1279
JoT 509
AS 3603
HW 2499
HoW 1517
Exor 1350
SoT 198
SoR 52
SoJ 24
Cens 801
Cons 399
HotR 338
HaNova 729
Melee 666
All damage values are against a single target. Cons damage is total per cast, Censure is a 5 stack over 15 seconds (ticks should be 20% of that). Judgement also assumes a 5-stack of Censure present on the target.
The setup is a 0/38/0 spec, no glyphs, no buffs, and naked except for the premade tanking weapon and shield (Mace of the Gullet and Bulwark of the Primordial Mound, no gems or enchants). Anyone with beta access who can create a premade can carry out this test, so it would help if a few different people took data for consistency checking. Please mention what your player stats are (AP, SP primarily) and make sure that you're not hitting a dummy that someone else is debuffing.
I'll be posting a similar request for level 80 values shortly, though obviously with a different spec and gear.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7467
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: A call to arms - Beta/PTR parses on WoL
Level 80 version on PTR:
<edit> Hold on, these aren't right, wrong base damages.
<edit2> Fixed.
Same talent spec (but skip EG and GbtL), no glyphs, no buffs, naked with a Dalaran Sword. If you need a shield to use ShoR (tooltip doesn't say so, but it may still need one), grab any white vendor shield (i.e. no stats but armor).
<edit> Hold on, these aren't right, wrong base damages.
<edit2> Fixed.
- Code: Select all
ShoR 626
CS 127
JoT 277
AS 3052
HW 2209
HoW 1290
Exor 1155
SoT 20
SoR 15
SoJ 7
Cens 426
Cons 215
HotR 34
HaNova 653
Melee 66
Same talent spec (but skip EG and GbtL), no glyphs, no buffs, naked with a Dalaran Sword. If you need a shield to use ShoR (tooltip doesn't say so, but it may still need one), grab any white vendor shield (i.e. no stats but armor).
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7467
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Return to Advanced Theorycraft and Calculations
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests