Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Warning: Theorycraft inside.

Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, Aergis, theckhd

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby theckhd » Thu Dec 12, 2013 8:36 am

Note that the FW glyph is averaged over the entire fight. So it's really 1/5 of its value during execute phase. Multiply by 5 to approximate how much DPS it grants sub-20% (i.e. around a 4.5% DPS increase if your 0.9% value is correct - I haven't checked your math).
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
Simcraft 6.x, Call to Arms 6.0, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 6.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
User avatar
theckhd
Moderator
 
Posts: 8029
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: Harrisburg, PA

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby Thels » Thu Dec 12, 2013 8:51 am

That's not really an exact science, as a lot of classes deal more damage in the sub-20% area. Since the boss receives more damage during the last 20%, a Patchwerk style boss will be in this phase for a shorter period of time.

But yeah, for final burn phases like the Dark Shamans, Final Wrath seems excellent.

You might want to take Focused Wrath, so that in encounters with multiple opponents, all damage goes to the mob below 20%.
ImageImage
User avatar
Thels
 
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby theckhd » Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:23 pm

Thels wrote:That's not really an exact science, as a lot of classes deal more damage in the sub-20% area.

Including us, hence "approximate." But note that what other classes do is irrelevant here - the sim is just a single paladin against a single boss, so the estimation of the DPS gain of Final Wrath is just (encounter-averaged value)*(fight length)/(time spent sub-20%).

edit: and that's roughly (encounter-averaged value)*5 here. If we account for the higher DPS, it's probably a little lower (say 4.5 as a rough guess?).
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
Simcraft 6.x, Call to Arms 6.0, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 6.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
User avatar
theckhd
Moderator
 
Posts: 8029
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: Harrisburg, PA

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby Thels » Sun Dec 15, 2013 8:02 am

It does make it interesting, though. Right now, it's our 4th DPS Glyph, but on fights where the last 20% is more important than the rest of the fight (Korkron Shamans?), it might very well be worth to take over another DPS Glyph.

It seems unlikely at this time that we'll ever see a Vaelastrasz encounter again.
ImageImage
User avatar
Thels
 
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby Darielle » Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:53 pm

Not without some massive revamping, no. Any encounter like that would devolve into "STack ALL the Warriors"
Darielle
 
Posts: 1319
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:41 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby Schroom » Mon Dec 16, 2013 7:46 am

I prefer final Wrath on fight where you have a lot of execute pahses. like spoils. lots of adds have lots of execute phases.

And I know those DPS. if an add is sub 5% they do NOTHING to it anymore. because "the DoTs will do the job"

"yeah... sure... why did we wipe again?"

so here I clearly prefer final wrath to make sure those things DIE.
User avatar
Schroom
 
Posts: 608
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 2:03 pm
Location: Luxembourg

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby theckhd » Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:28 pm

Rotation sim is nearly complete. Posting results here first so that you can comment on them.

Especially interested in:
-Anything that looks fishy
-Any rotation that you think would be interesting to add / compare

Note that this is all single-target; for AoE I need to modify this file, which could be either very easy or very difficult depending on how specific I want to get.
(Ex: if I just change it to 5 targets, it's easy. If I want to do a table of DPS vs. # of Mobs like I have in the past (see first page of this thread), then it's significantly more involved. I haven't decided what to do yet.

Note also that, as I mentioned on my blog last week, there was a significant bug with ES for prot. This explains why ES was so low in the talent sims. For this, I'm using my own latest build of SimC from the trunk, which has this bug fixed. So you may not be able to completely replicate these results in 542-1.

Code: Select all
basic Rotations
Max DPS Error: 87
Talents: 312232
Glyphs: focused_shield/word_of_glory/final_wrath

|               Rotation |    DPS |    HPS |   DTPS |    TMI |    Var |  SotR |  Wait |
|        CS>J>AS>Cons>HW | 377966 | 160063 | 160402 |  17016 |  26130 | 71.0% | 14.5% |
|        CS>J>AS>HW>Cons | 384511 | 159552 | 159891 |   5434 |   3570 | 71.4% | 13.2% |
|   CS+W0.3>J>AS>HW>Cons | 378839 | 157713 | 158030 |    426 |     73 | 73.2% | 12.7% |
|       CSw>J>AS>HW>Cons | 378607 | 157655 | 157973 |    360 |     42 | 73.2% | 12.7% |
|       CSw>AS>J>HW>Cons | 379101 | 158535 | 158857 |    545 |    189 | 72.4% | 12.8% |
|       J>CSw>AS>HW>Cons | 372725 | 162592 | 162962 |  68314 |  71730 | 68.5% | 17.4% |
|       J>AS>CSw>HW>Cons | 377386 | 163147 | 163520 |  28202 |  15002 | 67.9% | 17.0% |
|       AS>J>CSw>HW>Cons | 376938 | 163959 | 164336 | 265226 | 175401 | 67.2% | 17.4% |
|       AS>CSw>J>HW>Cons | 383576 | 159833 | 160169 |   1847 |    594 | 71.1% | 13.0% |
|      HotR>J>AS>HW>Cons | 376862 | 159510 | 159844 |   2844 |    894 | 71.4% | 13.2% |
| AS+GC>CSw>J>AS>HW>Cons | 379705 | 158225 | 158545 |    499 |    160 | 72.8% | 12.9% |
| CSw>AS+GC>J>AS>HW>Cons | 378862 | 158048 | 158368 |    455 |    128 | 72.9% | 12.8% |
| CSw>AS+GC>J>HW>AS>Cons | 378733 | 157901 | 158219 |    369 |     57 | 73.0% | 12.7% |
| CSw>AS+GC>J>HW>Cons>AS | 378692 | 157852 | 158174 |    370 |     41 | 73.1% | 12.5% |


Code: Select all
execute Rotations
Max DPS Error: 92
Talents: 312232
Glyphs: focused_shield/word_of_glory/final_wrath

|                   Rotation |    DPS |    HPS |   DTPS |   TMI |   Var |  SotR |  Wait |
|       CSw>J>AS>HW>Cons>HoW | 383928 | 157717 | 158033 |   407 |    94 | 73.2% | 11.2% |
|       CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 384332 | 157714 | 158034 |   348 |    30 | 73.2% | 11.0% |
|       CSw>J>AS>HoW>HW>Cons | 383724 | 157579 | 157889 |   391 |    66 | 73.3% | 10.9% |
|       CSw>J>HoW>AS>HW>Cons | 383508 | 157907 | 158233 |   410 |    57 | 73.0% | 10.9% |
|       CSw>HoW>J>AS>HW>Cons | 383459 | 158009 | 158340 |   498 |   160 | 72.9% | 10.9% |
|       HoW>CSw>J>AS>HW>Cons | 383838 | 158363 | 158732 | 30787 | 42566 | 72.5% | 11.0% |
| CSw>J>HW+FW>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 384853 | 157781 | 158103 |   373 |    61 | 73.1% | 11.0% |
| CSw>HW+FW>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 385007 | 158118 | 158455 |   372 |    32 | 72.8% | 11.0% |
| HW+FW>CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 385100 | 158116 | 158452 |   495 |   148 | 72.8% | 11.0% |


Code: Select all
defensive Rotations
Max DPS Error: 88
Talents: 313232
Glyphs: focused_shield/word_of_glory/final_wrath

|                            Rotation |    DPS |    HPS |   DTPS |    TMI |   Var |  SotR | Wait |
|             CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons>SS | 368484 | 111889 | 121224 | 215875 | 16872 | 68.8% | 3.3% |
|          CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>SS+R1>Cons | 370223 | 113782 | 122093 | 149299 | 13747 | 69.9% | 9.0% |
|       CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>SS+R1>Cons>SS | 367149 | 111763 | 118761 | 110363 |  9521 | 68.8% | 3.3% |
|       CSw>J>AS>HW>SS+R1>HoW>Cons>SS | 366926 | 111697 | 118260 |  97275 |  6456 | 68.7% | 3.3% |
|          CSw>J>AS>SS+R1>HW>HoW>Cons | 368772 | 113144 | 119982 | 100653 |  8645 | 69.9% | 9.1% |
|       CSw>J>AS>SS+R1>HW>HoW>Cons>SS | 367003 | 111638 | 118020 |  95814 |  5862 | 68.8% | 3.3% |
| CSw>J>AS+GC>SS+R1>AS>HW>HoW>Cons>SS | 366846 | 111678 | 118024 |  94221 |  6260 | 68.8% | 3.3% |
|       CSw>J>AS>SS+R2>HW>HoW>Cons>SS | 366893 | 111655 | 118031 | 101362 |  7371 | 68.8% | 3.3% |
|       CSw>J>AS>SS+R3>HW>HoW>Cons>SS | 366877 | 111682 | 118088 | 101001 |  9483 | 68.8% | 3.3% |
|       CSw>J>AS>SS+R4>HW>HoW>Cons>SS | 366619 | 111671 | 118064 |  96593 |  5492 | 68.8% | 3.3% |
|       CSw>J>AS>SS+R5>HW>HoW>Cons>SS | 366806 | 111669 | 118041 | 100004 |  7406 | 68.8% | 3.3% |
|          CSw>J>SS+R1>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 368637 | 112840 | 119195 |  81745 |  5018 | 70.0% | 9.1% |
|          CSw>SS+R1>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 368086 | 112756 | 119022 | 100434 |  7898 | 69.7% | 9.2% |
|          SS+R1>CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 368628 | 112673 | 119008 | 102389 |  8215 | 69.7% | 9.1% |


Code: Select all
talents Rotations
Max DPS Error: 91
Talents: 312232+custom
Glyphs: focused_shield/word_of_glory/final_wrath

|                 Rotation |    DPS |    HPS |   DTPS | TMI | Var |  SotR |  Wait |
|  CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons>ES | 404722 | 157823 | 158143 | 358 |  34 | 73.1% |  9.6% |
|  CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>ES>Cons | 406964 | 157829 | 158146 | 384 |  83 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|  CSw>J>AS>HW>ES>HoW>Cons | 407021 | 157837 | 158159 | 416 |  67 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|  CSw>J>AS>ES>HW>HoW>Cons | 406642 | 157771 | 158089 | 473 | 100 | 73.2% |  9.9% |
|  CSw>J>ES>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 405797 | 157818 | 158138 | 373 |  48 | 73.1% | 10.0% |
|  CSw>ES>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 405046 | 157868 | 158189 | 549 | 203 | 73.0% | 10.0% |
|  ES>CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 404993 | 158098 | 158418 | 514 | 137 | 72.8% | 10.1% |
|  CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons>LH | 393473 | 157951 | 158268 | 286 |  28 | 73.0% |  9.6% |
|  CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>LH>Cons | 394203 | 157942 | 158250 | 273 |  22 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|  CSw>J>AS>HW>LH>HoW>Cons | 394012 | 157996 | 158304 | 279 |  28 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|  CSw>J>AS>LH>HW>HoW>Cons | 393837 | 157966 | 158269 | 302 |  42 | 73.2% | 10.0% |
|  CSw>J>LH>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 394221 | 157945 | 158248 | 295 |  65 | 73.1% | 10.0% |
|  CSw>LH>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 394428 | 158084 | 158388 | 401 | 189 | 73.0% | 10.0% |
|  LH>CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 394936 | 158307 | 158614 | 432 | 115 | 72.7% | 10.0% |
| CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons>HPr | 396435 | 158261 | 158576 | 356 | 111 | 72.8% |  7.7% |
| CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>HPr>Cons | 396078 | 158371 | 158677 | 420 | 167 | 72.7% |  7.8% |
| CSw>J>AS>HW>HPr>HoW>Cons | 396037 | 158373 | 158684 | 310 |  55 | 72.7% |  7.9% |
| CSw>J>AS>HPr>HW>HoW>Cons | 394804 | 158164 | 158471 | 309 |  30 | 72.9% |  8.0% |
| CSw>J>HPr>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 394359 | 158132 | 158440 | 313 |  37 | 72.9% |  8.0% |
| CSw>HPr>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 393417 | 158399 | 158703 | 342 |  56 | 72.7% |  8.2% |
| HPr>CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 395484 | 159561 | 159883 | 481 |  77 | 71.6% |  8.3% |
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
Simcraft 6.x, Call to Arms 6.0, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 6.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
User avatar
theckhd
Moderator
 
Posts: 8029
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: Harrisburg, PA

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby Thels » Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:59 am

What does CSw stand for?

I thought it used to be a slight DPS gain to place AS on the top of the priority list, but from the top table, this no longer seems to be the case?

For the Execute rotations, there's HW and HW+FW. Does that mean over the course of a fight or entirely during Execution phase?

Having a CS>J>AS+GC>HW+FW>AS>HW>HoW>Cons rotation might be interesting, because that might very well be the highest DPS rotation without sacrificing any HoPo, from the looks of it.

Also, can we have a T90 comparison outside of Execution phase, as the addition of HoW takes away our filler spots.
ImageImage
User avatar
Thels
 
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby theckhd » Tue Jan 21, 2014 10:37 am

Oh, right, I guess I should explain the nomenclature.

The basic idea is (Ability)[+(Option)], where you can string options together. So for example, "W" is a "wait" option, such that "CS+W0.3" means "Use CS, or wait if CS's cooldown is less than 0.3 seconds." It translates into the following APL lines:
Code: Select all
actions+=/crusader_strike
actions+=/wait,sec=cooldown.crusader_strike.remains,if=cooldown.crusader_strike.remains>0&cooldown.crusader_strike.remains<=0.3


"CSw" is a shorthand for "CS+W0.35" because I wanted to condense things, and since we're almost always going to want to implement that wait.

Other options are things like:
"+FW" ("If Final Wrath is glyphed and target is in Execute Range")
"+GC" ("If the Grand Crusader buff is active")
"+R#" ("If the remaining duration of this buff is less than # seconds")

There are a bunch of others ("+ex" for execute range) but I think those three are the only ones I'm currently using here.

It looks like it's still a slight DPS gain to do AS>CSw>J>HW>Cons or AS+GC>CSw>J>AS>HW>Cons vs. CSw>J>AS>HW>Cons, but not very much. (Also note that the forum formatting here is somewhat limited; the blog post will let you sort each table by any column you want, which is very convenient.)

My earlier comment should clarify HW vs. HW+FW, but just in case, HW just checks if HW is available (i.e. /actions+=holy_wrath), HW+FW checks for execute range and glyph (i.e. actions+=/holy_wrath,if=glyph.final_wrath.enabled&target.health.pct<=20).

Should be simple to add that rotation; I thought it was in there before, but I may have removed it at some point. Easy enough to fix.

Note that all of these are results from regular sims, i.e. not artificially set to execute phase. So the T90 comparisons are for an entire fight, including execute phase. I can re-list them without HoW to see how they compare if you ignore execute range, but I'm not sure that's very useful. You have both HoW>L90 and L90>HoW versions, which should already give you all of the relevant information.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
Simcraft 6.x, Call to Arms 6.0, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 6.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
User avatar
theckhd
Moderator
 
Posts: 8029
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: Harrisburg, PA

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby Thels » Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:20 am

The +GC and +R marks were clear. The +W wasn't, but it makes sense.

The thing about T90 is that we earlier determined that outside of Execute range, it was best to save T90 for last, so it would fill an empty GCD. However, during Execute range, we have no empty GCDs, so that was a good reason to bump T90 up the priority list. Not sure if that's still the case.

It would therefor make sense to me to first establish the optimal rotation without using the Final Wrath glyph or Hammer of Wrath, much like you're already doing in the first post, but with the T90 abilities, and once we got the optimal rotation, use variants of that rotation with HW+FW, HoW and T90+EX placed in various locations.
ImageImage
User avatar
Thels
 
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby theckhd » Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:08 am

That should be sufficiently accomplished by adding the following two rotations to the mix, I think?
Code: Select all
                    'CSw>J>AS>HW>ES+ex>HoW>ES>Cons';
                    'CSw>J>AS>ES+ex>HW>HoW>ES>Cons';
                    'CSw>J>AS>HW+FW>ES+ex>HW>HoW>ES>Cons';


(With associated versions for LH and HPr).
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
Simcraft 6.x, Call to Arms 6.0, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 6.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
User avatar
theckhd
Moderator
 
Posts: 8029
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: Harrisburg, PA

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby theckhd » Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:26 am

Results; ignore the TMI column, it's using a new definition I'm testing, so it's not directly comparable to the values posted earlier in this thread:

Code: Select all
|                              Rotation |    DPS |    HPS |   DTPS | TMI | Var |  SotR |  Wait |
|               CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons>ES | 404778 | 157835 | 158154 | 732 |   3 | 73.0% |  9.6% |
|               CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>ES>Cons | 406739 | 157784 | 158102 | 728 |   3 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|               CSw>J>AS>HW>ES>HoW>Cons | 407066 | 157820 | 158142 | 728 |   3 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|               CSw>J>AS>ES>HW>HoW>Cons | 406621 | 157717 | 158036 | 725 |   3 | 73.2% |  9.9% |
|               CSw>J>ES>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 406142 | 157816 | 158137 | 728 |   3 | 73.1% | 10.0% |
|               CSw>ES>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 405073 | 157864 | 158183 | 733 |   3 | 73.0% | 10.0% |
|               ES>CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 405626 | 158151 | 158474 | 759 |   3 | 72.7% | 10.0% |
|         CSw>J>AS>HW>ES+ex>HoW>ES>Cons | 407265 | 157770 | 158091 | 727 |   3 | 73.1% |  9.7% |
|         CSw>J>AS>ES+ex>HW>HoW>ES>Cons | 406901 | 157838 | 158156 | 729 |   3 | 73.0% |  9.8% |
|   CSw>J>AS>HW+FW>ES+ex>HW>HoW>ES>Cons | 406992 | 157816 | 158136 | 734 |   3 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|               CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons>LH | 393515 | 157924 | 158240 | 686 |   3 | 73.1% |  9.6% |
|               CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>LH>Cons | 394249 | 158001 | 158304 | 677 |   3 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|               CSw>J>AS>HW>LH>HoW>Cons | 393747 | 158043 | 158346 | 676 |   2 | 73.0% |  9.8% |
|               CSw>J>AS>LH>HW>HoW>Cons | 394315 | 157977 | 158278 | 673 |   2 | 73.2% |  9.9% |
|               CSw>J>LH>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 394188 | 157955 | 158259 | 668 |   3 | 73.1% | 10.0% |
|               CSw>LH>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 394436 | 158061 | 158365 | 669 |   3 | 73.0% | 10.0% |
|               LH>CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 394946 | 158310 | 158617 | 688 |   3 | 72.7% | 10.0% |
|         CSw>J>AS>HW>LH+ex>HoW>LH>Cons | 394050 | 158036 | 158342 | 677 |   3 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|         CSw>J>AS>LH+ex>HW>HoW>LH>Cons | 393880 | 158044 | 158349 | 676 |   2 | 73.0% |  9.8% |
|   CSw>J>AS>HW+FW>LH+ex>HW>HoW>LH>Cons | 394057 | 158011 | 158317 | 677 |   2 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|              CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons>HPr | 396639 | 158192 | 158512 | 707 |   3 | 72.9% |  7.6% |
|              CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>HPr>Cons | 395690 | 158304 | 158613 | 689 |   3 | 72.8% |  7.9% |
|              CSw>J>AS>HW>HPr>HoW>Cons | 395583 | 158351 | 158659 | 692 |   3 | 72.8% |  7.9% |
|              CSw>J>AS>HPr>HW>HoW>Cons | 394853 | 158238 | 158544 | 681 |   3 | 72.9% |  8.0% |
|              CSw>J>HPr>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 394588 | 158159 | 158466 | 683 |   3 | 72.9% |  8.0% |
|              CSw>HPr>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 393779 | 158397 | 158702 | 701 |   3 | 72.7% |  8.1% |
|              HPr>CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 395843 | 159532 | 159858 | 759 |   3 | 71.6% |  8.2% |
|       CSw>J>AS>HW>HPr+ex>HoW>HPr>Cons | 395850 | 158402 | 158711 | 692 |   3 | 72.7% |  7.9% |
|       CSw>J>AS>HPr+ex>HW>HoW>HPr>Cons | 395447 | 158380 | 158683 | 691 |   3 | 72.7% |  7.9% |
| CSw>J>AS>HW+FW>HPr+ex>HW>HoW>HPr>Cons | 395841 | 158405 | 158713 | 692 |   3 | 72.7% |  7.9% |
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
Simcraft 6.x, Call to Arms 6.0, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 6.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
User avatar
theckhd
Moderator
 
Posts: 8029
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: Harrisburg, PA

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby Thels » Mon Jan 27, 2014 5:03 am

CSw>J>AS>HW>ES+ex>HoW>ES>Cons seems the highest DPS option from that list, but is there any chance you could compare the following two options?

CSw>J>AS+GC>HW>AS>ES+ex>HoW>ES>Cons
CSw>J>AS+GC>HW+FW>AS>HW>ES+ex>HoW>ES>Cons

Surprisingly, CSw>J>AS>LH>HW>HoW>Cons is the best DPS option with LH while optimizing HoPo gain. That doesn't feel right. ES deals more damage single target than LH, still, we prio HW over ES, but we prio LH over HW?
ImageImage
User avatar
Thels
 
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby theckhd » Mon Jan 27, 2014 9:53 am

I'll add those two and re-run the sims to see if that oddity is consistent. My guess is that it's RNG - even though SimC Reports "DPS Error" as ~80 DPS, I don't know offhand what that metric represents (i.e. is it standard deviation, or st. dev. of the mean? Or something else?). My guess is that these results are only accurate to +/- 200-300 DPS. This is with 50k iterations; for the final data I might bump it up to 100k to see if that helps.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
Simcraft 6.x, Call to Arms 6.0, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 6.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
User avatar
theckhd
Moderator
 
Posts: 8029
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: Harrisburg, PA

Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - MoP/5.x

Postby theckhd » Mon Jan 27, 2014 2:51 pm

Here are the results, I think comparing this to the previous set makes it clear that the DPS of any individual sim can vary by +/-200 DPS, at least. Our confidence interval is probably twice the "Max DPS Error" metric. I'll try to look into what exactly SimC is doing to calculate that metric so I can determine what it is, statistically speaking.

talents Rotations
Max DPS Error: 91
Talents: 312232+custom
Glyphs: focused_shield/word_of_glory/final_wrath
Code: Select all
|                                    Rotation |    DPS |    HPS |   DTPS | TMI | Var |  SotR |  Wait |
|                     CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons>ES | 404804 | 157844 | 158165 | 492 | 200 | 73.1% |  9.6% |
|                     CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>ES>Cons | 406976 | 157856 | 158174 | 357 |  63 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|                     CSw>J>AS>HW>ES>HoW>Cons | 407139 | 157885 | 158207 | 383 |  70 | 73.0% |  9.7% |
|                     CSw>J>AS>ES>HW>HoW>Cons | 406760 | 157737 | 158052 | 502 | 189 | 73.2% |  9.9% |
|                     CSw>J>ES>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 406476 | 157790 | 158110 | 332 |  25 | 73.1% |  9.9% |
|                     CSw>ES>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 405132 | 157812 | 158132 | 366 |  35 | 73.1% | 10.0% |
|                     ES>CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 405262 | 158135 | 158459 | 575 | 213 | 72.7% | 10.0% |
|               CSw>J>AS>HW>ES+ex>HoW>ES>Cons | 407061 | 157858 | 158177 | 418 |  99 | 73.0% |  9.8% |
|               CSw>J>AS>ES+ex>HW>HoW>ES>Cons | 406700 | 157815 | 158135 | 480 | 259 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|         CSw>J>AS>HW+FW>ES+ex>HW>HoW>ES>Cons | 407187 | 157787 | 158109 | 416 |  67 | 73.1% |  9.7% |
|         CSw>J>AS+GC>HW>AS>ES+ex>HoW>ES>Cons | 405762 | 157755 | 158077 | 570 | 365 | 73.1% |  9.7% |
|   CSw>J>AS+GC>HW+FW>AS>HW>ES+ex>HoW>ES>Cons | 407219 | 157829 | 158148 | 373 |  54 | 73.1% |  9.7% |
|                     CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons>LH | 393282 | 157995 | 158313 | 379 | 165 | 73.1% |  9.7% |
|                     CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>LH>Cons | 393939 | 157990 | 158296 | 293 |  40 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|                     CSw>J>AS>HW>LH>HoW>Cons | 394072 | 157941 | 158251 | 283 |  58 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|                     CSw>J>AS>LH>HW>HoW>Cons | 393892 | 157921 | 158222 | 307 |  64 | 73.2% | 10.0% |
|                     CSw>J>LH>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 393699 | 158053 | 158357 | 414 | 304 | 73.1% | 10.0% |
|                     CSw>LH>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 394312 | 158082 | 158388 | 392 | 104 | 73.0% | 10.0% |
|                     LH>CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 395052 | 158316 | 158627 | 407 | 140 | 72.7% | 10.0% |
|               CSw>J>AS>HW>LH+ex>HoW>LH>Cons | 393794 | 158053 | 158358 | 324 |  72 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|               CSw>J>AS>LH+ex>HW>HoW>LH>Cons | 393790 | 157980 | 158285 | 318 |  64 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|         CSw>J>AS>HW+FW>LH+ex>HW>HoW>LH>Cons | 393965 | 158031 | 158338 | 428 | 256 | 73.1% |  9.8% |
|         CSw>J>AS+GC>HW>AS>LH+ex>HoW>LH>Cons | 393028 | 157967 | 158273 | 494 | 387 | 73.1% |  9.7% |
|   CSw>J>AS+GC>HW+FW>AS>HW>LH+ex>HoW>LH>Cons | 393717 | 158015 | 158325 | 364 | 159 | 73.0% |  9.8% |
|                    CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons>HPr | 396650 | 158260 | 158579 | 338 |  37 | 72.9% |  7.6% |
|                    CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>HPr>Cons | 395982 | 158417 | 158726 | 331 |  55 | 72.7% |  7.8% |
|                    CSw>J>AS>HW>HPr>HoW>Cons | 395922 | 158348 | 158658 | 350 | 112 | 72.7% |  7.9% |
|                    CSw>J>AS>HPr>HW>HoW>Cons | 394881 | 158167 | 158475 | 310 |  46 | 72.9% |  8.0% |
|                    CSw>J>HPr>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 394627 | 158172 | 158482 | 324 |  59 | 72.9% |  8.0% |
|                    CSw>HPr>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 393760 | 158422 | 158730 | 324 |  62 | 72.7% |  8.1% |
|                    HPr>CSw>J>AS>HW>HoW>Cons | 395560 | 159531 | 159856 | 515 | 104 | 71.6% |  8.3% |
|             CSw>J>AS>HW>HPr+ex>HoW>HPr>Cons | 395869 | 158422 | 158732 | 353 |  84 | 72.7% |  7.9% |
|             CSw>J>AS>HPr+ex>HW>HoW>HPr>Cons | 395607 | 158406 | 158711 | 898 | 905 | 72.8% |  7.9% |
|       CSw>J>AS>HW+FW>HPr+ex>HW>HoW>HPr>Cons | 396031 | 158397 | 158705 | 312 |  30 | 72.7% |  7.8% |
|       CSw>J>AS+GC>HW>AS>HPr+ex>HoW>HPr>Cons | 395034 | 158196 | 158502 | 311 |  49 | 72.9% |  7.7% |
| CSw>J>AS+GC>HW+FW>AS>HW>HPr+ex>HoW>HPr>Cons | 395909 | 158406 | 158716 | 348 |  47 | 72.7% |  7.9% |
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
Simcraft 6.x, Call to Arms 6.0, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 6.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
User avatar
theckhd
Moderator
 
Posts: 8029
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: Harrisburg, PA

PreviousNext

Return to Advanced Theorycraft and Calculations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 380 on Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest