Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, Aergis, theckhd
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
theothersteve7 wrote:Am I reading this right? I see 1000 AP with 40% uptime. Compared to 600 dodge with 13% uptime for Windwalk.
Whoa, wait a moment.
LS and WW have the same proc chance (1 PPM, not haste-normalized) and the same triggers; what's different is the proc duration. Their (theoretical) average uptime is therefore "about the same" (LS should be ~115% WW). Encounters that will butcher one of them (time-off-target : moving/stuns/attack "speed" debuffs a.s.o.) will also butcher the other one.
Last edited by tlitp on Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-

tlitp - Posts: 552
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
Hey everyone,
I wanted to determine the ICD on the Porcelain Crab (Heroic), however this will be a very long process without a tool to parse a log >.>
Does someone have a tool that can scan and determine the earliest time between procs ? So far my 8 stopwatch tests have yielded results of 103-164 seconds between procs (obviously without benefit of reckoning or raid buffs as it's a target dummy)
I was debating leaving my toon attacking for a while, but it's pointless if I cant figure out the answer afterward... And I think the Wowhead comment that reported 80 seconds ICD might be wrong.
Anyway, Might help in determining it's value compared to other trinkets
I wanted to determine the ICD on the Porcelain Crab (Heroic), however this will be a very long process without a tool to parse a log >.>
Does someone have a tool that can scan and determine the earliest time between procs ? So far my 8 stopwatch tests have yielded results of 103-164 seconds between procs (obviously without benefit of reckoning or raid buffs as it's a target dummy)
I was debating leaving my toon attacking for a while, but it's pointless if I cant figure out the answer afterward... And I think the Wowhead comment that reported 80 seconds ICD might be wrong.
Anyway, Might help in determining it's value compared to other trinkets
- Sur-Pseudo
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:44 pm
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
It's probably 100s (for the vast majority of the Cataclysm-specific, ICD-based dynamic effects, the ICD is five times the proc duration). Check SimC later on, when they'll update it.
-

tlitp - Posts: 552
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
tlitp wrote:LS and WW have the same proc chance (1 PPM, not haste-normalized) and the same triggers; what's different is the proc duration. Their (theoretical) average uptime is therefore "about the same" (LS should be ~115% WW). Encounters that will butcher one of them (time-off-target : moving/stuns/attack "speed" debuffs a.s.o.) will also butcher the other one.
Oh, I guess this comes from a misunderstanding on my end with procs. You say "not haste-normalized"; I assumed 1 PPM was 1 PPM was 1 PPM. So if haste effects increase proc rates that means a few things.
1. The data in a dps gear and spec would not be an accurate portrayal of uptime of the same enchant on a tank weapon.
2. Given raid buffs (windfury, etc) I can expect WW to be worth more than 100 dodge rating on average.
I've never really looked into proc mechanics before. Thanks.
Moo.
- theothersteve7
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:45 am
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
About 0.8-1% dodge, post-DR(). Accurate for a (tank-oriented) raid gear set, ~359 average ilvl.
-

tlitp - Posts: 552
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
Oh, sweet, I missed that post, just what I was looking for. According to that, Windwalk is worth around 190-240 dodge rating, and Landslide is worth 380-450 AP, scaling toward to upper ends of those ranges with more expertise and hit. Normal values (and expertise glyph) put them right around 200 dodge and 400 AP respectively. Landslide isn't really even worth mentioning at those values. Good information for Ret, though.
Moo.
- theothersteve7
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:45 am
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
# Crusader Strike weapon damage percent has been increased to 135%, up from 115%.
I'm assuming this puts ISH9 to bed for good, and should make Expertise even more amazing than it already is.
I'm assuming this puts ISH9 to bed for good, and should make Expertise even more amazing than it already is.
- Durability
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:15 am
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
tlitp wrote:About 0.8-1% dodge, post-DR(). Accurate for a (tank-oriented) raid gear set, ~359 average ilvl.
How does that compare to using Mending? Did I miss the memo on average healing output with it?
-

Kelaan - Posts: 4036
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:01 pm
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
Kelaan wrote:tlitp wrote:About 0.8-1% dodge, post-DR(). Accurate for a (tank-oriented) raid gear set, ~359 average ilvl.
How does that compare to using Mending? Did I miss the memo on average healing output with it?
It's not exactly rigorous theorycraft, but Mending usually ended up being about ~10% of my self-healing if I recall. Don't discount the movement portion of WW either.
- Durability
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:15 am
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
hey,
does it stack with PoJ ? Thought not...
Bye, RedAces.
Durability wrote:Don't discount the movement portion of WW either.
does it stack with PoJ ? Thought not...
Bye, RedAces.
-

RedAces - Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:39 am
- Location: Germany
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
RedAces wrote:does it stack with PoJ ?
Initial reports are that it does.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7454
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
theckhd wrote:RedAces wrote:does it stack with PoJ ?
Initial reports are that it does.
I can confirm via GetUnitSpeed that it does stack multiplicatively with POJ. WW+POJ = 132% increased movement speed.
- Durability
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:15 am
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
Enchant comparison has been updated.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7454
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
theckhd wrote:Enchant comparison has been updated.
As always thanks you, Theck. One thing though could you add Pyrium Weapon Chain to the comparison ?
- Kishi
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:42 am
Re: Theck's MATLAB thread - Cataclysm/4.x
I'll add it for future versions. For now, you can estimate the value by multiplying the Titanium Weapon Chain by 1.43. So the new weapon chain is around 48-49 DPS, barely ahead of Accuracy.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7454
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Return to Advanced Theorycraft and Calculations
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
