Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis - WotLK/3.x
Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, Aergis, theckhd
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
sealava wrote:Just wondering if you had any data for glyphed Holy Wrath?
i would like that also,seems very useful in ICC.
My impression is that HW is primarily a trash ability as well, though if you're using SoCom for trash I could see glyphing DP/HotR/HW for a trash-tanking spec. In fact, I may try that for tonight since I haven't used my ret spec in roughly forever.
Either way, I'll try and nail down some numbers for Holy Wrath just to see where it falls in the damage per cast spectrum. If it fails to do as much as Judgement, you wouldn't want to use it on bosses.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7452
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
Since Theck/Jere didn't find time to test BW, I'll post the request here as well :
1. equip a block-heavy set (block-capped, 2000+ BV)
2. equip this (horde only) or this, toss a BW
3. spec 0/5 Reckoning (mandatory); the rest are all optional
4. get to the target dummy hero
5. autoattack him to death; no specials/no seals (mandatory)
6. parse the combat log (WMO/WoL)
7. specify your stats - weapon/avoidance/haste/hit/exp
This should provide a ~20 mins testing session, which will serve as a final confirmation of the analytical model of BW. Thanks.
1. equip a block-heavy set (block-capped, 2000+ BV)
2. equip this (horde only) or this, toss a BW
3. spec 0/5 Reckoning (mandatory); the rest are all optional
4. get to the target dummy hero
5. autoattack him to death; no specials/no seals (mandatory)
6. parse the combat log (WMO/WoL)
7. specify your stats - weapon/avoidance/haste/hit/exp
This should provide a ~20 mins testing session, which will serve as a final confirmation of the analytical model of BW. Thanks.
-

tlitp - Posts: 552
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
tlitp wrote:Since Theck/Jere didn't find time to test BW, I'll post the request here as well :
1. equip a block-heavy set (block-capped, 2000+ BV)
2. equip this (horde only) or this, toss a BW
3. spec 0/5 Reckoning (mandatory); the rest are all optional
4. get to the target dummy hero
5. autoattack him to death; no specials/no seals (mandatory)
6. parse the combat log (WMO/WoL)
7. specify your stats - weapon/avoidance/haste/hit/exp
This should provide a ~20 mins testing session, which will serve as a final confirmation of the analytical model of BW. Thanks.
Would Vindication be a problem for that?
-

Thels - Posts: 720
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:30 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
theckhd wrote:Either way, I'll try and nail down some numbers for Holy Wrath just to see where it falls in the damage per cast spectrum. If it fails to do as much as Judgement, you wouldn't want to use it on bosses.
How many consecration ticks are needed per cast to out threat HW? Putricide doesn't look very stationary from the videos I have watched and substituting HW over consecration (after AS) could lead to a threat increase.
-

lythac - Moderator
- Posts: 2576
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:10 am
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
Lythac wrote:theckhd wrote:Either way, I'll try and nail down some numbers for Holy Wrath just to see where it falls in the damage per cast spectrum. If it fails to do as much as Judgement, you wouldn't want to use it on bosses.
How many consecration ticks are needed per cast to out threat HW? Putricide doesn't look very stationary from the videos I have watched and substituting HW over consecration (after AS) could lead to a threat increase.
I spent as much time as I could DPSing the blobs, and still had zero problems with my threat on putricide. My lead was bigger than it is on average bosses. That applied even when we had no melee with us, so I could stand ready next to the blob and switch right away.
-

Thels - Posts: 720
- Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:30 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
tlitp wrote:Since Theck/Jere didn't find time to test BW, I'll post the request here as well
Yeah, sorry, I haven't had time to do much other than raid in-game lately. If nobody gets to it before this weekend, I'll try and do it Saturday or Sunday morning. Trying to solo Thrym with no buffs is sorta asking for it on a PvP server where you're significantly outnumbered.
Thels wrote:Lythac wrote:How many consecration ticks are needed per cast to out threat HW? Putricide doesn't look very stationary from the videos I have watched and substituting HW over consecration (after AS) could lead to a threat increase.
I spent as much time as I could DPSing the blobs, and still had zero problems with my threat on putricide. My lead was bigger than it is on average bosses. That applied even when we had no melee with us, so I could stand ready next to the blob and switch right away.
I think the more relevant point is that in this case, it's more damage on the boss. Especially in phase 3, this could be a relevant concern, as every little bit helps.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7452
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
yeah, sorry 
Between work, raiding, fixing my house, and getting prepped for my marriage this spring, I have been pretty swamped.
Between work, raiding, fixing my house, and getting prepped for my marriage this spring, I have been pretty swamped.
-

jere - Posts: 2877
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 5:12 pm
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
Request for a calculation (yes, I see Theck has no time until the weekend, not urgent).
Ok, what do I want to know, well, with the ICC Radiance, we should be short of the 102,4 Block-Cap. At least I'm right now. Now my question is, how helpful will redoubt become? And then, what about good old defence? If defence gives miss + dodge + parry AND block chance, is it not a good idea to try to get some socket bonus and socket yellow sockets with +def and stam instead of gooing all out on stamina?
Without the ICC radiance we all knew for T9, go straight to stam and don't think about anything else with sockets. But does that change, does that change at all?
Ok, what do I want to know, well, with the ICC Radiance, we should be short of the 102,4 Block-Cap. At least I'm right now. Now my question is, how helpful will redoubt become? And then, what about good old defence? If defence gives miss + dodge + parry AND block chance, is it not a good idea to try to get some socket bonus and socket yellow sockets with +def and stam instead of gooing all out on stamina?
Without the ICC radiance we all knew for T9, go straight to stam and don't think about anything else with sockets. But does that change, does that change at all?
- Sarkan-ZdC
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 4:00 am
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
On the topic of Holy Wrath:
Assuming that Holy Wrath is affected by OHWS, Crusade, Glyph of Sense Undead, Curse of Elements, and Sanctified Retribution, and uses the standard spell hit/crit/resistance mechanics, here's the code for it and the results of the Ability Damage calculation:
And here's damage/TPS with seal procs baked into each ability:
So it does 2142 damage per target, on average. For a single target, this places it behind everything but Holy Shield. It's about half as strong as Consecration, so if the boss is moving enough that he only takes 4 or fewer ticks of Consecration, you may as well just substitute Holy Wrath in its place as often as possible.
Holy Wrath scales linearly with the number of mobs, however. For 2 mobs, it's 4284 damage, which is now ahead of both Judgement and Holy Shield. For 3+ it out-does ShoR as well. Note that Consecration scales linearly with the number of mobs as well, so HW will never out-scale Cons for trash (unless the trash is moving out of the Consecrate, I suppose).
HotR is tricky because I'm not sure I have a good formula for how the HotR cleave damage is split up. But in an AoE situation you'd want to be using HotR anyhow, so it's probably not critical.
So in all likelihood, HW is a potential increase on Marrowgar (but only during storm), Deathwhisper (but only if you have to move her due to D&D), Rotface (but only when you move him to avoid shadow crash), Putricide (whenever you have to move him, which is a lot of the time, especially in P3).
It should also be quite good on trash, but we knew that already. I actually dropped my ret spec for a Reckoning build with DP/HotR/HW glyphs to try out in heroics and 25-man ICC trash tonight for the hell of it (not like I've used the ret spec in the last month or so anyhow).
Assuming that Holy Wrath is affected by OHWS, Crusade, Glyph of Sense Undead, Curse of Elements, and Sanctified Retribution, and uses the standard spell hit/crit/resistance mechanics, here's the code for it and the results of the Ability Damage calculation:
- Code: Select all
HoWra = (1050 + 0.07.*SP + 0.07.*AP).* ... %inherent
(OHWS.*Crusade).* ... %talents
(GoSU).* ... %glyphs
(CoE.*SanctRet); %buffs/debuffs
Holy_Wrath = HoWra.* ... %base
(100 - boss_spell_resist)./100.* ... %hit,
(1+(scrit_multiplier-1).*spell_crit./100).* ... % crit factor
boss_resist_reduce; %boss resist
- Code: Select all
Ability Raw Dmg. Net Dmg. Glyphed Net Threat Glyphed
ShoR 3608 3833 0 9866 0
HotR 4294 4561 0 11740 0
Cons 4755 4197 0 10803 0
JoV 2628 3023 3326 7781 8561
JoC 1300 1495 0 3848 0
JoR 2516 2895 0 7452 0
AS 2391 2750 5501 7079 14160
HoW 3250 3739 0 9624 0
SoV 502 590 0 1519 0
SoC 547 582 0 1498 0
SoR 506 480 0 1236 0
HV 6239 5914 0 15223 0
HS 1281 1131 0 2911 0
Exor 3103 3071 0 7905 0
HoWra 2164 2142 2142 5514 5514
Melee 1346 953 0 1363 0
- Code: Select all
Ability DPS Glyphed TPS Glyphed
ShoR 639 0 1644 0
HotR 760 0 1957 0
Cons 466 0 1200 0
JoV 336 370 865 951
JoC 166 0 428 0
JoR 322 0 828 0
AS 76 153 197 393
HoW 623 0 1604 0
SoV 718 0 1847 0
SoC 708 0 1822 0
SoR 637 0 1640 0
HV 197 0 507 0
HS 407 0 1047 0
Exor 205 0 527 0
HoWra 71 143 184 368
Melee 736 0 1052 0
And here's damage/TPS with seal procs baked into each ability:
- Code: Select all
Ability Damage Glyphed TPS Glyphed
ShoR 4423 0 1897 0
HotR 5151 0 2210 0
Cons 4197 0 1200 0
JoV 3613 3916 1033 1120
AS 2750 5501 197 393
HoW 3739 0 1604 0
HV 5914 0 507 0
HS 1131 0 1047 0
HoWra 2142 2142 184 368
Melee 1543 0 2224 0
So it does 2142 damage per target, on average. For a single target, this places it behind everything but Holy Shield. It's about half as strong as Consecration, so if the boss is moving enough that he only takes 4 or fewer ticks of Consecration, you may as well just substitute Holy Wrath in its place as often as possible.
Holy Wrath scales linearly with the number of mobs, however. For 2 mobs, it's 4284 damage, which is now ahead of both Judgement and Holy Shield. For 3+ it out-does ShoR as well. Note that Consecration scales linearly with the number of mobs as well, so HW will never out-scale Cons for trash (unless the trash is moving out of the Consecrate, I suppose).
HotR is tricky because I'm not sure I have a good formula for how the HotR cleave damage is split up. But in an AoE situation you'd want to be using HotR anyhow, so it's probably not critical.
So in all likelihood, HW is a potential increase on Marrowgar (but only during storm), Deathwhisper (but only if you have to move her due to D&D), Rotface (but only when you move him to avoid shadow crash), Putricide (whenever you have to move him, which is a lot of the time, especially in P3).
It should also be quite good on trash, but we knew that already. I actually dropped my ret spec for a Reckoning build with DP/HotR/HW glyphs to try out in heroics and 25-man ICC trash tonight for the hell of it (not like I've used the ret spec in the last month or so anyhow).
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7452
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
Thels wrote:tlitp wrote:Since Theck/Jere didn't find time to test BW, I'll post the request here as well :
(...)
Would Vindication be a problem for that?
Please, no JotJ/Vindication applications. This, combined with the exclusion of specials/seals/Reckoning, will grant a more steady/controlled environment. Getting a log that is polluted with any other procs makes that harder the task to track only one very specific variable. (Divine Plea and Redoubt procs are OK, heals as well; however, a paladin with 2000+ BV should be all but impervious to Thrym's attacks)
@ Theck and Jere : no problem, we're all subject to "the afk factor". After all, my own situation is worse - I don't even have an active account.
-

tlitp - Posts: 552
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
theckhd wrote:It should also be quite good on trash, but we knew that already. I actually dropped my ret spec for a Reckoning build with DP/HotR/HW glyphs to try out in heroics and 25-man ICC trash tonight for the hell of it (not like I've used the ret spec in the last month or so anyhow).
Yeah, it's super fun. When I was AV rep farming I used this spec:
http://www.wowarmory.com/character-talents.xml?r=Kilrogg&cn=Phonic&gn=Clout+Mace
And I kept it since then for trash, heroics, etc
-

Phonic - Posts: 206
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 7:52 am
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
I did the same, I love it.
5/5 reckoning, 5/5 conviction, 3/3 crusade, SoComm + glyphs of HW/SoV/HotR and a aggro-blocking stuff with 3k+ block value and 3k force
I currently use this configuration for heros, I tried it on trash in ICC and it is so much fun
I had to do some very non-conventional choices to do this build: http://eu.wowarmory.com/talent-calc.xml ... 0000000000
It is definitely unfit for boss tanking...
I just forgot about the proccing of SoComm from JotJ; I should probably put at least one point there and go for 4/5 conviction, in order to maintain the cleaving effect on the judgement
5/5 reckoning, 5/5 conviction, 3/3 crusade, SoComm + glyphs of HW/SoV/HotR and a aggro-blocking stuff with 3k+ block value and 3k force
I currently use this configuration for heros, I tried it on trash in ICC and it is so much fun
I had to do some very non-conventional choices to do this build: http://eu.wowarmory.com/talent-calc.xml ... 0000000000
It is definitely unfit for boss tanking...
I just forgot about the proccing of SoComm from JotJ; I should probably put at least one point there and go for 4/5 conviction, in order to maintain the cleaving effect on the judgement
- Thalastor82
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:27 am
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
Yeah, if you're going for "batshit insane aoe dps," you want 1/2 JotJ. From your spec, you could move the point from vindication or conviction over there.
It's also worth noting that you'd get more mileage out of 1/5 SotP + 4/5 Conviction than just 5/5 Conviction.
It's also worth noting that you'd get more mileage out of 1/5 SotP + 4/5 Conviction than just 5/5 Conviction.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7452
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
theckhd wrote:Yeah, if you're going for "batshit insane aoe dps," you want 1/2 JotJ. From your spec, you could move the point from vindication or conviction over there.
It's also worth noting that you'd get more mileage out of 1/5 SotP + 4/5 Conviction than just 5/5 Conviction.
Doesn't vindication also proc the SoComm? If not, my choice has already been done
I didn't know that 1/5 SotP - 4/5 Conviction could be better of 5/5 conviction, simply because it affects only the judgment, since the Seal of choice for this spec is SoComm. I'll have a look again at your graphs, thanks for the hint
- Thalastor82
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:27 am
Re: Theck's MATLAB TPS analysis (A Jonesy derivative work)
Thalastor82 wrote:Doesn't vindication also proc the SoComm? If not, my choice has already been done
I didn't know that 1/5 SotP - 4/5 Conviction could be better of 5/5 conviction, simply because it affects only the judgment, since the Seal of choice for this spec is SoComm. I'll have a look again at your graphs, thanks for the hint
No, I don't believe Vindication procs it.
And you're correct about SotP not affecting SoCom, I was thinking of SoV for some strange reason. For add tanking with SoCom stick with Conviction.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
MATLAB 5.x, Call to Arms 5.x, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 5.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
-

theckhd - Moderator
- Posts: 7452
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Harrisburg, PA
Return to Advanced Theorycraft and Calculations
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 3 guests

