Remove Advertisements

Runescroll of Fortitude

How to get started.

Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, Aergis, lythac

Runescroll of Fortitude

Postby darthsuo » Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:51 pm

Why does nobody ever mention Runescroll of Fortitude II when they talk about tanking consumables?

I know it was bugged and giving only +165 stam, but 4.0.6 fixed that.

Is there some other reason why it shouldn't be used?
darthsuo
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:16 pm

Re: Runescroll of Fortitude

Postby bldavis » Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:01 pm

most of us run with priests

but if you dont have a priest of any spec, by all means use this!
it is a great addition
Image

Brekkie:Tanks are like shitty DPS. And healers are like REALLY distracted DPS
Amirya:Why yes, your penis is longer than his because you hit 30k dps in the first 10 seconds. But guess what? That raid boss has a dick bigger than your ego.
Flex:I don't make mistakes. I execute carefully planned strategic group wipes.
Levie:(in /g) It's weird, I have a collar and I dont know where I got it from, Worgen are kinky!
Levie:Drunk Lev goes and does what he pleases just to annoy sober Lev.
Sagara:You see, you need to *spread* the bun before you insert the hot dog.
User avatar
bldavis
 
Posts: 7336
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:04 pm
Location: Searching for myself. If i get back before I return, please have me stop and wait for myself.

Re: Runescroll of Fortitude

Postby Vuarnet » Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:56 am

bldavis wrote:most of us run with priests

but if you dont have a priest of any spec, by all means use this!
it is a great addition


...or a warrior, or a lock, or a beast hunter...there's lots of ways to get that juicy stam buff nowadays. But certainly, by all means, if you're not running with any of the above, the runescroll is a great addition and should not be overlooked. While it's never an issue for the raids I'm on, I've got a guildie who keeps those plus the "cheap kings" drums buff (since he's a LW) on hand just in case we ever get into a pug heroic that can't/won't cover most/all of the buffs...rare, but it happens.

I suppose the biggest reason people don't mention the runescroll is #1) assumption the buff will be covered by a player, and #2) it's simply overlooked because of #1. There's certainly no reason it should not be used if the stam buff is not being covered by an actual player ability (and imo that logic applied even before the 4.0.6 fix).
fuzzygeek wrote:Admittedly you can't outgear the criminally stupid, but you can try to mitigate the effects.
Vuarnet
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:39 am

Re: Runescroll of Fortitude

Postby Gaxby » Sat Mar 12, 2011 10:35 pm

Since when did a Druid mention Blessing of Kings or a Paladin mention Mark of the Wild? Same thing. :D
Gaxby, Energizer Pally of Grim Batol
User avatar
Gaxby
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Runescroll of Fortitude

Postby Addi » Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:06 pm

The Scroll of Stamina IX counts as a Guardian Elixir.
Addi
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:00 pm

Re: Runescroll of Fortitude

Postby Koatanga » Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:21 pm

We have a lock, but the felhound is usually out, not the imp. We have a hunter, but he's not BM. No warrior.

I like the runescroll for the fort buff, but I really hate spending 80g every time we wipe.
Koatanga, Capnhammer, Shapely, Sultry, Boondoggle, Doominatrix of Greenstone - Dath'Remar
Koatanga
 
Posts: 1877
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:46 pm


Return to Basic Training & Talents

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


Remove Advertisements

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 380 on Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest