Remove Advertisements

Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Get help with your character's gear

Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, Aergis, Sabindeus, majiben, lythac, Digren

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Sagara » Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:31 am

Oh, maybe even on solo fights. I'm guessing that unless you're a) pushing week 2 heroics or b) the weakest link in the group, you're not going to get much mileage off the tank enchant. Now the question is how much mileage you're willing to lose to get a nice DPS proc.

Also, it's going to be really interesting to see wether SoI procs off Xuen's proc.
When that day comes, seek all the light and wonder of this world, and fight.

Worldie wrote:I used to like it [mean] back on Sylvanas.

Queldan - EU Stormrage (H) - Good night, sweet prince.
User avatar
Sagara
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:04 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Thorill » Thu Jul 04, 2013 1:54 am

Sagara wrote:Well, technically, they could say "the right cloak is available at the Quartermaster, only 10k!"
Low blow, but hey!

Looking at mmo-champ today, it appears the legendary effect is tied to the tanking cloak only. http://ptr.wowdb.com/items/102245-qian-le-courage-of-niuzao
Thorill
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 5:13 am

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Kelerei » Thu Jul 04, 2013 1:57 am

Noticed this too: http://ptr.wowhead.com/search?q=date%3A2013-07-03

Seems like the upgrade is to the entire cloak, so those with the tanking cloak will get the tank effect, those with the DPS cloak will get the DPS effect... which really puts us tankadins between a rock and a hard place.
Kelerei
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:21 am
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Thels » Thu Jul 04, 2013 2:20 am

:(

I wonder how many Brewmasters and Guardians actually took the Dodge cloak.
ImageImage
User avatar
Thels
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 7:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Fenrìr » Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:27 am

Unless there's some mechanic that requires a cheesing effect, I really don't see myself getting the tank one (unless they allow us to have two).
Image
Fenrìr
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 1237
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:41 am

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Worldie » Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:30 am

Honestly speaking, in heroic progress, it can happen that stuff goes wrong, and a healer dies or healers can't heal, and you take that blow that lands 0.1 seconds before the heal, and wipe.

Not having the cheat death effect on heroic progress, unless it's an EXTREMELY TIGHT dps race, is stupid, very stupid, and in fact selfish, as you show you care more for your e-peen on the meters rather than to doing your job.

Stop being obsessed with topping damage meters.

The reason for which you stack haste is that it increases Paladin survivability, and also has the side effect of increasing the DPS. If haste didn't increase your survivability, you'd be stacking MASTERY like warriors and dks, which does NOTHING for dps.

The main reason for which some tanks use the DPS meta instead of the tank one is that the tank one is RNG and thus you can't count on it. If it was a flat % damage reduction, you'd use it all the time.
theckhd wrote:Fuck no, we've seen what you do to guilds. Just imagine what you could do to an entire country. Just visiting the US might be enough to make the southern states try to secede again.

halabar wrote:Noo.. you don't realize the problem. Worldie was to negative guild breaking energy like Bolvar is to the Scourge. If Worldie is removed, than someone must pick up that mantle, otherwise that negative guild breaking energy will run rampant, destroying all the servers.
User avatar
Worldie
Global Mod
 
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:49 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Treck » Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:28 am

Fenrìr wrote:Unless there's some mechanic that requires a cheesing effect, I really don't see myself getting the tank one (unless they allow us to have two).

1k haste (were gonna haste cap in SoO gear anyway)
or a lifesaver every 1 freaking minute...
Get your priorities as a tank straight tbh.

Maybe, just MAYBE after 3 months of farm i could be interested in taking the dps version, procc on the dps one doesnt seem to insane either.

The tank one lets you play incredibly recklessly as well before it proccs if you wanna do that.
Image
User avatar
Treck
 
Posts: 2128
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 8:10 am

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Worldie » Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:45 am

Sometimes I wish I had you in my friendlist treck!
theckhd wrote:Fuck no, we've seen what you do to guilds. Just imagine what you could do to an entire country. Just visiting the US might be enough to make the southern states try to secede again.

halabar wrote:Noo.. you don't realize the problem. Worldie was to negative guild breaking energy like Bolvar is to the Scourge. If Worldie is removed, than someone must pick up that mantle, otherwise that negative guild breaking energy will run rampant, destroying all the servers.
User avatar
Worldie
Global Mod
 
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:49 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Treck » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:54 am

My Realid is on this forum :P

About the cloaks, I want to dig deeper on it a bit.
Tank cloak beeing able to procc once a min is incredibly overpowered for progress.
But so is the tank meta gem.
Its just relative to what you can choose.
We dont quite know how big of a dps increase the dps cloak procc will be, and sure the haste and useless crit will help do more dps.
If that procc stands for about 10% dps increase? then yeh sure I can see its arguable to use that cloak in certain situations if they allow us to have one of each at the same time.

We will have to wait untill its on PTR to see the full extent on it.
But they have constantly been nerfing passive lifesavers for tanks cause they are to good (old AD!?)
Purgatory seems to have been staying for a while, but only due to the fact that DKs are so weak compared to the other classes in terms of their Active mitigation.
Looking into new expansions, I wouldnt be suprised if this cloak keeps having its uses...
Image
User avatar
Treck
 
Posts: 2128
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 8:10 am

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Worldie » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:56 am

I'd not be surprised if both the legendary meta and the legendary cloak get a "wont work past level 90" affix when 6.0 is released.
theckhd wrote:Fuck no, we've seen what you do to guilds. Just imagine what you could do to an entire country. Just visiting the US might be enough to make the southern states try to secede again.

halabar wrote:Noo.. you don't realize the problem. Worldie was to negative guild breaking energy like Bolvar is to the Scourge. If Worldie is removed, than someone must pick up that mantle, otherwise that negative guild breaking energy will run rampant, destroying all the servers.
User avatar
Worldie
Global Mod
 
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:49 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby fuzzygeek » Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:03 am

Worldie wrote:Not having the cheat death effect on heroic progress, unless it's an EXTREMELY TIGHT dps race, is stupid, very stupid, and in fact selfish, as you show you care more for your e-peen on the meters rather than to doing your job.

Stop being obsessed with topping damage meters.


You've got an awfully narrow view, and accusing people of being selfish and DPS obsessed is starting to descend into ad hominem.

Increasing rDPS makes fights shorter and decreases the window in which things can go terribly wrong leading to raid wipes and death. to use your example, perhaps if rDPS was better the fight would have been over before you take that blow that lands 0.1 seconds before the heal, and would not have wiped in the first place. It is easy to come up with edge anecdotes that support either PoV. These anecdotes are pointless in a useful discussion.

If all we cared about was survivability then we'd be stacking stam -- as it is STILL the best survivability stat. We're not. Why? Because we're trading off stam for haste. Why? Is it just because of DPS epeen?

Maybe for some. They're missing the point. For me, the DPS increase is secondary to the ancillary benefits of haste. To wit: damage smoothing, shortening fights, and increasing SoL rHPS healing. If they completely removed the rDPS increase from haste and made crit do more DPS but less HP gen and SoL healing, I would still stick with haste because those are the secondary benefits I prioritize.

Not because of DPS, and not because of any kind of epeen waving as you're alleging. The increased DPS is ancillary to shortening fights.

I care about killing bosses, and there are more ways we can contribute to making a fight as easy as possible than being just a meat shield.

All that being said, this wrangling is stupid. Apparently we can have both cloaks, and can wear whichever is appropriate for our raid and progression level. The tanking proc will be a hell of a lot more useful for those doing week 2 heroics and 25H, just as gold plated insurance policies are more useful to those with higher risk lifestyles.

I'm going to have both cloaks, just as I have both metas, and I'll be wearing the tank meta and cloak and my stam trinkets during progression pulls to make the fights last as long as possible before I die, then I'm going to do everything I can to make the fights as short as possible as soon as we know how to kill it.

There are legitimate reasons for choosing either cloak. Demonizing one side or another is nonproductive and doesn't add to the conversation at all.
Image
User avatar
fuzzygeek
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 5130
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:58 pm

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Sagara » Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:30 am

Stating you want haste to help smoothness is a bit of a lie, though, as Stam remains the premier smoothing stat. And technically, the tank proc is nothing less than a nice 100k free health (number courtesy of MyAss mathematics) on top of your current total.
When that day comes, seek all the light and wonder of this world, and fight.

Worldie wrote:I used to like it [mean] back on Sylvanas.

Queldan - EU Stormrage (H) - Good night, sweet prince.
User avatar
Sagara
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:04 am
Location: Belgium

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Meloree » Thu Jul 04, 2013 1:02 pm

Greetings! I probably should have checked here, first, so crossposting from the 5.4 thread in General...

Assertion: The proc on the tank cloak is hilariously overpowered. So overpowered, in fact, that I contend that it's worth more DPS than the DPS cloak's stats and procs, even with the subpar itemization, in addition to being worth more survival than, roughly, anything that's ever been in the game before, barring 3.2 era Ardent Defender.

How is it worth DPS, you might ask? I contend that it is so hilariously good for raw survival that you could happily start reforging your stats into crit and come out ahead on survival AND dps over any other option.

Proof of assertion is left as an exercise for the reader. Because that is WAY easier on me.
Meloree
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 1420
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:15 am

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby fuzzygeek » Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:32 pm

Sagara wrote:Stating you want haste to help smoothness is a bit of a lie, though, as Stam remains the premier smoothing stat. And technically, the tank proc is nothing less than a nice 100k free health (number courtesy of MyAss mathematics) on top of your current total.


It is not a lie. In my opinion the additional benefits from haste are worth the reduced smoothing efficacy. Does haste help with damage smoothing? Yes? Is the delta between stacking haste and stacking stam worth the additional raid benefits? I would argue it is.

Part of my dislike of the tank proc is that it is a process and not controllable. I don't know that you can precisely compare it to AD since it is not an at-will cool down. If it were I think you would see much less discussion comparing the merits because it would be obvious.

Likewise the tanking meta. Why are we so willing to trade off a giant chunk of stam and 2% damage redux for pure DPS with no ancillary benefits? Would. We be so willing if the metagem was a clicky?

Edit: now that I think about it, I've been thinking about it wrong. It is like AD, only it is ALWAYS active unless on CD. Hmm.
Last edited by fuzzygeek on Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Image
User avatar
fuzzygeek
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 5130
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:58 pm

Re: Oxhorn Bladebreaker vs Tigerclaw Cape

Postby Sagara » Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:39 pm

Just wanted to clear up that the choice of haste is a sacrifice of smoothness. But considering I'm also haste stacking to a point, I'd agree it's worth the tradeoff :-p

Be careful not to compare the gem and the cloak. The gem is utterly random, and as such is typically rubbish in smoothness - like treck mentionned, the dps meta was insane while the tanking one just average at best.

To the cloak, I think you're mistaking its strenght for a weakness - it's like an always-on cooldown, basically. You don't control it, because you don't HAVE TO - it'll aways trigger when you need it - i.e. when you die.
When that day comes, seek all the light and wonder of this world, and fight.

Worldie wrote:I used to like it [mean] back on Sylvanas.

Queldan - EU Stormrage (H) - Good night, sweet prince.
User avatar
Sagara
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:04 am
Location: Belgium

PreviousNext

Return to Gear Discussions and Advice

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot] and 1 guest


Remove Advertisements

Who is online

In total there are 3 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 380 on Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot] and 1 guest
?php } else { ?