Yes I read that blue HOLY dps
Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, Aergis
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Yes I read that blue HOLY dps
ty and goodbye.
Thnx worldie for your civilized reply earlier. Im going away now Im obviously too irritable for the forums
Thnx worldie for your civilized reply earlier. Im going away now Im obviously too irritable for the forums
- Thorgramn
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:03 am
This is the post you were looking for:
http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/threa ... 93&sid=1#0
Applicable quote:
3) Judgement and Seals: Damage reduced by 20%. This is the major damage adjustment -- a lot of damage was coming from these. We do realize this hurts Holy and Protection as well, and that is something for which we are prepared to offer compensation (particularly if it hurts Protection's threat generation).
http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/threa ... 93&sid=1#0
Applicable quote:
3) Judgement and Seals: Damage reduced by 20%. This is the major damage adjustment -- a lot of damage was coming from these. We do realize this hurts Holy and Protection as well, and that is something for which we are prepared to offer compensation (particularly if it hurts Protection's threat generation).
-

DeadMilliken - Posts: 596
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:19 am
Re: Yes I read that blue HOLY dps
Thorgramn wrote:ty and goodbye.
Thnx worldie for your civilized reply earlier. Im going away now Im obviously too irritable for the forums
Since no one else will spell it out for you, here's a parting gift:
and "if this effects prot THREAT", but has Blizzard once acknowledged the dps effect on prot. It seems to be completely ignore
If it affects Prot's threat, it will also affect Prot's damage, because they are invariably linked. They ARE aware of it.
Also IBTL (or delete)
Mmm, nitpicking.
Last edited by Drathian on Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Drathian
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:01 am
Re: Yes I read that blue HOLY dps
Drathian wrote:If it affects Prot's threat, it will also affect Prot's damage, because they are invariably linked now. They ARE aware of it.
Always been.
Dude, don't.Drathian wrote:Also IBTL (or delete)
-

Snake-Aes - Maintankadonor
- Posts: 15434
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 3:15 am
- Location: Thorns
You asked a question, got a few level-headed replies saying to continue your discussion in an already-existing thread, and then the thread was locked. Then, you created another new thread in a more condescending tone. While people around here are usually willing to "newbie grace" a mistake and point people in the correct direction once, if you're not going to take guidance when it's offered there's going to be some fallout.
Honestly, there are probably more people upset about the multiple threads and disregarding of suggestion to not do that than the actual post content. (That and... your question was already answered a few times. It feels like you didn't get the answer you wanted, so you're asking again hoping things are different.)
-Splug
Honestly, there are probably more people upset about the multiple threads and disregarding of suggestion to not do that than the actual post content. (That and... your question was already answered a few times. It feels like you didn't get the answer you wanted, so you're asking again hoping things are different.)
-Splug
Active raid character: http://www.wowarmory.com/character-shee ... an&n=Spyte
255 characters is not enough to fit my alts' armories in.
255 characters is not enough to fit my alts' armories in.
-

Splug - Maintankadonor
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:16 am
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest



