Remove Advertisements

Ghostcrawler must think I'm some sort of idiot...

All things related to the expansion

Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, Aergis

Ghostcrawler must think I'm some sort of idiot...

Postby Warcraft » Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:21 pm

Taken from his comments regarding the Retribution nerfs...

"We do realize this hurts Holy and Protection as well, and that is something for which we are prepared to offer compensation (particularly if it hurts Protection's threat generation)."

If it hurts our threat generation? Is this a joke? Seals and Judgements do Holy damage. Our source of threat is Holy damage.

They should not be "prepared to offer" compensation when they know they're nerfing our threat, they should just do it.

Better yet, they should just nerf Retribution Paladins in ways that only effect Retribution Paladins.

This is the original definition of a slap in the face. Not the nerf itself, but these halfwit comments about it.
User avatar
Warcraft
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:49 am

Postby Macha » Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:23 pm

But you can't nerf ret stuff! That'd hurt flexibility!!!
Macha
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:50 pm

Postby Sharlos » Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:33 pm

In after nerdrage.
I hate signatures, but i love irony
User avatar
Sharlos
 
Posts: 1566
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Warcraft » Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:36 pm

Glad to see this forum turning into worldofwarcraft.com General Chat...
User avatar
Warcraft
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 4:49 am

Postby knaughty » Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:42 pm

Warcraft wrote:Glad to see this forum turning into worldofwarcraft.com General Chat...

You complaining about stupid answers.
Warcraft wrote:This is the original definition of a slap in the face. Not the nerf itself, but these halfwit comments about it.

Quoting your QQ OP.

Seals got nerfed.

Devs say they watching it.

You (as usual) post "Sky is falling". Do you EVER post anything but QQ?

Seriously... "slap to the face"? Cliche much?

Oh, and did we need an eleventy-seventh QQ thread?

IBTL
This isn't the "Offtankadin" forum. My MoP FAQ: http://tinyurl.com/FAQ-5-0
- Knaughty.
User avatar
knaughty
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3558
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:06 pm
Location: Sydney, plotting my next diatribe against the forces of ignorance!

Postby Arees » Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:42 pm

Warcraft wrote:Glad to see this forum turning into worldofwarcraft.com General Chat...


well in all fairness, you're the one that started a QQ post. There is already a post here talking about this very same GC post.
Image
User avatar
Arees
 
Posts: 546
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 9:50 pm

Postby PsiVen » Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:49 pm

"Prepared to offer" obviously means that they plan to see how it is for Prot and Holy and find ways to buff them separately from Ret. GC said a couple weeks ago that they were definitely looking at Holy DPS and nothing has changed there yet. Relax.
Gladiator Psiven, Retired Tankadin
WoW-sober since March 2014
Longtime addict of Space - Glory Through Conquest
User avatar
PsiVen
Moderator
 
Posts: 4364
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 5:28 pm
Location: On a Boat

Postby Zibey » Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:57 pm

Tbh, as far as I dont like Warcraft attitude I have to admitt i took GC comment about tps as insulting to our inteligence. And I no longer hope for being on par with warriors - thnking of lvling mine to 80 and throwing paladin away actually. It might be qq, but its not nerd-rage qq... more like one of trustful puppy that got kicked for no reason :/.
Gniev - The Maelstrom EU
User avatar
Zibey
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 6:04 am

Postby Levantine » Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:16 pm

Knaughty wrote:
Warcraft wrote:Glad to see this forum turning into worldofwarcraft.com General Chat...

You complaining about stupid answers.
Warcraft wrote:This is the original definition of a slap in the face. Not the nerf itself, but these halfwit comments about it.

Quoting your QQ OP.

Seals got nerfed.

Devs say they watching it.

You (as usual) post "Sky is falling". Do you EVER post anything but QQ?

Seriously... "slap to the face"? Cliche much?

Oh, and did we need an eleventy-seventh QQ thread?

IBTL


QFT.
User avatar
Levantine
 
Posts: 10818
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: NQ, Aus

Postby Worldie » Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:35 pm

QQ or not, we got already about 2 topics regarding this topic, so i'd rather keep the discussion not split.
theckhd wrote:Fuck no, we've seen what you do to guilds. Just imagine what you could do to an entire country. Just visiting the US might be enough to make the southern states try to secede again.

halabar wrote:Noo.. you don't realize the problem. Worldie was to negative guild breaking energy like Bolvar is to the Scourge. If Worldie is removed, than someone must pick up that mantle, otherwise that negative guild breaking energy will run rampant, destroying all the servers.
User avatar
Worldie
Global Mod
 
Posts: 13365
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:49 pm
Location: Italy


Return to WotLK

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


Remove Advertisements

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 380 on Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
?php } else { ?