patch 5.2 ?

Anything, including off-topic posts

Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, PsiVen, Sabindeus, Aergis

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Teranoid » Thu Jan 31, 2013 9:23 am

Sagara wrote:Don't know- I haven't seen tsulong go beyond his third night phase in LFR (and if I remember right, he enrages after the third Day phase instead of the second on LFR)


He enrages but it didn't seem to do anything when this gem happened

Image

I lost count how many times he went between day and night.
User avatar
Teranoid
 
Posts: 1639
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:56 pm

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Sagara » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:32 am

oldboyz wrote:if Blizz want to make more sexy the pure avoidance stats and wroc havoc our current tanking priority :
successfull parry --> 5 sec strengh buff
successfull dodge --> 10sec haste bonus
successfull dodge/parry/block --> "advantage bonus" (+hit +expertise)
:idea:


PS.
promise of several night figuring how to modelize&optimise it! :mrgreen: :mrgreen:


We discussed that a bit a few pages before, and Theck had that very nice idea of linking avoidance to HoPo generation, like by activating Grand Crusader. The plus is that we stay inside the existing model without adding extra mechanics left and right.

Teranoid wrote:
Sagara wrote:Don't know- I haven't seen tsulong go beyond his third night phase in LFR (and if I remember right, he enrages after the third Day phase instead of the second on LFR)


He enrages but it didn't seem to do anything when this gem happened

Image

I lost count how many times he went between day and night.


Wait. Wut? That passed by stupid, left depressing in the dust, and didn't bother to slow at pathetic...
When that day comes, seek all the light and wonder of this world, and fight.

Worldie wrote:I used to like it [mean] back on Sylvanas.

Queldan - EU Stormrage (H) - Good night, sweet prince.
User avatar
Sagara
 
Posts: 3272
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:04 am
Location: Belgium

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby KysenMurrin » Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:45 am

Quite often on LFR Tsulong, the health bar goes backwards on day phase and progress is only made in night, so I can imagine that happening easily with a low dps group. Haven't seen it go more than 3 day phases myself, though.
KysenMurrin
 
Posts: 4877
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:37 am
Location: UK

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Darielle » Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:39 pm

Continually lowering the bar, especially when they lack a platform to actually help players improve.
Ugh.

It's also going to be fun if/when premades start rolling around wiping people for 10 stacks to parse on LFR meters.
Darielle
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:41 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Xfighter » Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:55 pm

Darielle wrote:Continually lowering the bar, especially when they lack a platform to actually help players improve.
Ugh.

It's also going to be fun if/when premades start rolling around wiping people for 10 stacks to parse on LFR meters.

This was my first thought when I read it yesterday.

Should still be a small amount who go and do that though.
Xfighter
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:05 pm

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Darielle » Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:40 pm

It's more frightening when you consider their implied hint that they could play with difficulty a bit and possibly avoid nerfing LFR encounters. Ranking is niche enough that it shouldn't be a big deal, people intentionally using it is worse.

Week 1:
"Guys we're going to wipe 10 times on Will because Will is too hard without 10 stacks".
"Hurry up and die on Garalon, we can't do this with less than 5 stacks".

Honestly, LFR just needs to be reworked and repurposed to be some kind of Tutorial-esque mode instead.
Darielle
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:41 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Sabindeus » Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:56 pm

Sagara wrote:We discussed that a bit a few pages before, and Theck had that very nice idea of linking avoidance to HoPo generation, like by activating Grand Crusader. The plus is that we stay inside the existing model without adding extra mechanics left and right.


Sorry if I missed the discussion, but wouldn't GrCr proc on avoid lead to the degenerate case where your SHotR uptime scales with the number of mobs you're tanking? Unless it had a separate ICD to prevent that...
Image
Turn In, an NPC interaction automator - http://wow.curse.com/downloads/wow-addo ... rn-in.aspx
User avatar
Sabindeus
Moderator
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 9:24 am

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Flex » Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:11 pm

That was brought up and the implementation of using an ICD was suggested.
We live in a society where people born on third base constantly try to steal second, yet we expect people born with two strikes against them to hit a homerun on the first pitch.
User avatar
Flex
 
Posts: 4677
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:29 am

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Darielle » Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:08 pm

Proccing Grand Crusader would automatically cap at the respective gcd even when fighting infinite mobs. An ICD would only be if that was "too much", and tbh it probably would slip under the radar.
Darielle
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:41 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Sabindeus » Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:19 pm

Darielle wrote:Proccing Grand Crusader would automatically cap at the respective gcd even when fighting infinite mobs. An ICD would only be if that was "too much", and tbh it probably would slip under the radar.


I don't think they want us having 100% ShotR uptime though. So the GCD would be too much.
Image
Turn In, an NPC interaction automator - http://wow.curse.com/downloads/wow-addo ... rn-in.aspx
User avatar
Sabindeus
Moderator
 
Posts: 6050
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 9:24 am

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Darielle » Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:31 pm

It would take almost a 1 sec gcd to actually achieve that (counting HA's "bank"), and that's if the hits incoming are staggered enough that you will get a proc in between every gcd exactly (aka swings from mobs with a 1.5 sec swing timer, and on average parry being high enough to guarantee a proc). I don't think they'd even hypothetically be concerned about that popping up in actual raids, and if they were they would just do what they did with SD and SB to prevent 100% coverage; give it a charge system that refreshes every 4.5 seconds or whatever, so you could it back to back and use procs back to back, and use the same amount of HP, just not get 100% uptime on ShoR.
Darielle
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:41 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Fenris » Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:19 pm

We are considering some other buffs to Ret still. We don't know yet if we will do any or all of these (they are emphatically not promises) but the kind of thing we are considering:

- Glyph of Blessed Life -- no longer requires Seal of Insight. You can have any Seal or none active, which puts the glyph in Ret's hands.
- Glyph of Templar's Verdict -- damage reduction triggered by Exorcism (or both) instead. That way you aren't choosing TV over a heal.
- Light's Hammer -- also snares targets it damages while in range. This one potentially buffs Holy too, but we're not sure that many Holy paladins would give up Prism to take it.


Light's hammer one might have pve uses for us

Maybe

Sometimes

I guess :lol:
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
Fenris
 
Posts: 493
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 3:51 am
Location: Italy

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Darielle » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:13 pm

Lots of uses actually, although most guilds have probably adjusted enough by now to ensure they have the snares available for the fights that need them.
Darielle
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:41 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Klaudandus » Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:38 pm

I was thinking something... would you guys be ok if Sanctity of Battle was removed, but instead SotR lasts longer even if its weaker?

It seems the value of Haste is because we want to hit SotR as fast as possible because its buff is really short.
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 9430
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby theckhd » Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:03 pm

Klaudandus wrote:I was thinking something... would you guys be ok if Sanctity of Battle was removed, but instead SotR lasts longer even if its weaker?

It seems the value of Haste is because we want to hit SotR as fast as possible because its buff is really short.

Funny you should mention that, as it's one example I have in the blog post going live tomorrow.

Short version: it could happen with SoB removed, if I recall correctly they were toying with a 4.5-sec version in beta pre-SoB. A 4.5-second version would get a pretty hefty mitigation nerf to keep it balanced though, probably by 50%. Having 50% mitigation for 3 seconds is less powerful than having 25% for 4.5 seconds (see also: block cap). Obviously TDR would go up in that situation, but we haven't cared about TDR in quite a while.

I'd actually be OK with SoB going away and keeping the 3-second SotR, provided they did something to make avoidance attractive. Holy power through avoidance could more or less replace the HP gain from haste scaling to keep SotR uptime high without encouraging us to grab haste. It would lock us back to the 1.5-second GCD, though.

You won't see a 4.5-second SotR with SoB though, for sure. Too many concerns about block-capping v2.0.

Sabindeus wrote:
Darielle wrote:Proccing Grand Crusader would automatically cap at the respective gcd even when fighting infinite mobs. An ICD would only be if that was "too much", and tbh it probably would slip under the radar.


I don't think they want us having 100% ShotR uptime though. So the GCD would be too much.

As Darielle already pointed out, GCD wouldn't be that big of an issue. With SoB, you might get enough haste to reach a 1-second GCD and get 100% uptime on SotR, but only while tanking so many mobs that you'd basically need that uptime to survive. Without SoB or at at low haste, you're talking about 1.5-second GCDs, so 4.5 seconds to build up the 3 HP it takes to power 3 seconds of SotR. Still gaps in the coverage.

Against single targets it's much less problematic. Bosses don't swing faster than 1.5s, and if you're avoiding multiple attacks in a row you're also not getting any benefit from the SotR uptime during those avoids.

In any event, they'd probably put a sane ICD on it (like 4.5 seconds) just to make sure none of those were problems.
"Theck, Bringer of Numbers and Pounding Headaches," courtesy of Grehn|Skipjack.
Simcraft 6.x, Call to Arms 6.0, Talent Spec & Glyph Guide 6.x, Blog: Sacred Duty
User avatar
theckhd
Moderator
 
Posts: 6211
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: Harrisburg, PA

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Darielle » Thu Jan 31, 2013 8:50 pm

I was thinking something... would you guys be ok if Sanctity of Battle was removed, but instead SotR lasts longer even if its weaker?

It seems the value of Haste is because we want to hit SotR as fast as possible because its buff is really short.


Personally? I'd be conflicted.

It's nice that ShoR is AS powerful because being that high amount of pure physical DR that works on everything is incredibly useful when it comes to trivialising mechanics.
It's also not nice that ShoR is that powerful because it makes those mechanics funky in how much they should do (think Qiang on 10-man and the flexibility to solo-MA), how comfortable your healers are, and how your healers react for different classes (For example, our healers have this habit of derping hard when I'm taking Exhale as a Bear over Psiven as a Paladin. There's no logical reason for it, but it definitely happens to healers)

For straight up white hit tanking, I guess I wouldn't care.
Darielle
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:41 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Skye1013 » Thu Jan 31, 2013 9:03 pm

I know we've somewhat moved past this discussion, but in regards to snap aggro... how "gamebreaking" would it be to just attribute Light's Hammer aggro to the caster instead of it being considered "pet" aggro? And do you think doing so would help fix the snap aggro issue in aoe situations?
"me no gay, me friends gay, me no like you call me gay, you dumb dumb" -bldavis
"Here are the values that I stand for: I stand for honesty, equality, kindness, compassion, treating people the way you wanna be treated, and helping those in need. To me, those are traditional values. That’s what I stand for." -Ellen Degeneres
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." -Jon Stewart
Horde: Clopin Dylon Sharkbait Xiaman Metria Metapriest
Alliance: Schatze Aleks Deegee Baileyi Sotanaht Danfer Shazta Rawrsalot Roobyroo
User avatar
Skye1013
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3572
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:47 am
Location: JBPH-Hickam, Hawaii

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Klaudandus » Thu Jan 31, 2013 9:42 pm

not seeing why they shouldnt, considering protection warriors get an aoe taunt with their banners.
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 9430
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Sagara » Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:48 pm

I'd sacrifice a warlock to get LH's aggro. Make that two warlocks and a priest - less people on my tier gear.

Re: SoB - I still believe it's the best approach to solve the whole haste shenanigans. The only trouble is how GC stated he "understood" that haste was fun. I'm hoping they're not building a complicated answer just for that sake, though.

Just sack SoB, get GC to proc off avoidance with a nice ICD, and off we go!
When that day comes, seek all the light and wonder of this world, and fight.

Worldie wrote:I used to like it [mean] back on Sylvanas.

Queldan - EU Stormrage (H) - Good night, sweet prince.
User avatar
Sagara
 
Posts: 3272
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:04 am
Location: Belgium

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Skye1013 » Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:12 am

Has GC (or any other devs) commented on why LH aggro is separate? Seems like an easy fix that would make a lot of pally tanks happy.
"me no gay, me friends gay, me no like you call me gay, you dumb dumb" -bldavis
"Here are the values that I stand for: I stand for honesty, equality, kindness, compassion, treating people the way you wanna be treated, and helping those in need. To me, those are traditional values. That’s what I stand for." -Ellen Degeneres
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance." -Jon Stewart
Horde: Clopin Dylon Sharkbait Xiaman Metria Metapriest
Alliance: Schatze Aleks Deegee Baileyi Sotanaht Danfer Shazta Rawrsalot Roobyroo
User avatar
Skye1013
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3572
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:47 am
Location: JBPH-Hickam, Hawaii

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Sagara » Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:19 am

You get two guesses. Hint: it's the usual answer.
When that day comes, seek all the light and wonder of this world, and fight.

Worldie wrote:I used to like it [mean] back on Sylvanas.

Queldan - EU Stormrage (H) - Good night, sweet prince.
User avatar
Sagara
 
Posts: 3272
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 1:04 am
Location: Belgium

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Winkle » Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:35 am

Promdates wrote:The gearing is essentially the same. 25s do get 2.5x the drops, but they also have 2.5x the number of players in the raid. Can't tell you the number of times we've seen 2-3 of the same item that no one needs/wants. They don't want 25s to die off, I'm not sure if you've noticed is 100% happening currently. Why raid 25 when you can do less work and raid 10. So they want to give people a reason to do 25s again, otherwise no one will be doing it by the next expac. Chances of a 25 going to 10, decently high. Chances of that same 10 going back to 25... not at all.


I believe it takes an average of 9 weeks to get full gear set in 25man raiding and 20 weeks in a 10man raid.
Winkle
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:36 am

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Winkle » Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:41 am

Teranoid wrote:Wouldn't that imply that LFR mechanics can't be ignored 90% of the time?


There's mechanics in LFR?
Winkle
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:36 am

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Worldie » Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:32 am

I believe Elegon's floor counts as mechanic :mrgreen:
theckhd wrote:Fuck no, we've seen what you do to guilds. Just imagine what you could do to an entire country. Just visiting the US might be enough to make the southern states try to secede again.

halabar wrote:Noo.. you don't realize the problem. Worldie was to negative guild breaking energy like Bolvar is to the Scourge. If Worldie is removed, than someone must pick up that mantle, otherwise that negative guild breaking energy will run rampant, destroying all the servers.
User avatar
Worldie
Global Mod
 
Posts: 8753
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 1:49 pm
Location: Italy

Re: patch 5.2 ?

Postby Winkle » Fri Feb 01, 2013 5:38 am

Worldie wrote:I believe Elegon's floor counts as mechanic :mrgreen:


True, it is actually pretty hilarious watching half a raid plummet to their death.
Winkle
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:36 am

PreviousNext

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 380 on Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest