Anyone else not need an Authentcator this morning to log in?
Moderators: Fridmarr, Worldie, Aergis, Sabindeus, PsiVen
47 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: Anyone else not need an Authentcator this morning to log
by thegreatheed » Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:44 pm
halabar wrote:Third, the authenticators are not as secure as you think. Read up on RSA's recent troubles. Lockheed Martin got hacked because they trusted RSA, so now about 20 million government and defense workers in the US are gonna get new authenticators.
This doesn't diminish the security of Blizzard's authenticators. They didn't crack RSA's encryption. or any other similar level encryption. They hacked the company through a backdoor in hardware, and stole customer info.
Authenticators are as secure as they've ever been.
- thegreatheed
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 12:02 pm
Re: Anyone else not need an Authentcator this morning to log
by masterpoobaa » Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:27 pm
We have 3 separate PC's on the same ADSL home network.
2 of the computers haven't needed the authenticator since the change. Not sure about the 3rd.
We opted for the static IP address.
2 of the computers haven't needed the authenticator since the change. Not sure about the 3rd.
We opted for the static IP address.
Ellifain @ Khaz'Goroth does not approve of torture, save where there's experience/rep/loot involved.
- masterpoobaa
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:14 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Australia, Earth, Sol, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Universe.
47 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4