Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Invisusira's playground

Moderators: Aergis, Invisusira

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Klaudandus » Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:15 am

Klaudandus wrote:
Paxen wrote:
Klaudandus wrote:That said, the electronic surveillance is so incredibly easy to defeat, provided you want to put in the effort -- just look at General Van Riper's tactics in the Millenium Challenge 2002, where he defeated the opposing team by using non-electronic means of communication -- The judges of the war game had to rewrite the rules in order to restrict what Van Riper could and could not do in order to defeat him the 2nd time around.


Yikes, that's an awesome/terryfying story. The bit about communications isn't the critical part, though - the important stuff seems to be that carriers can't dodge, can't take a hit (and their defenses can be saturated by low tech attacks) and that attacks are too reliant on electronic signatures to find targets (a carrier can't go dark, a cruise missile site doesn't need an electronic signature). Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002 (And a random angry blog post: http://www.exile.ru/articles/detail.php ... =35&PAGE=1)


Yep. I know most people overlook the communications part, but not me. It shows what you can do when you don't rely on electronics. Heck, you can openly communicate on a CB radio and still defeat it provided you use something as simple as a Book Cipher. To make things interesting, you could probably have a set rotation of book ciphers. Takes a lot of effort, but without the context, the message is useless to anyone else that is on the wire listening to it.

Electronic encryption right now is meaningless seeing that the standard in use was compromised since its implementation.
http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/7 ... mental.pdf
Recommending against the use of SP 800-90A Dual Elliptic Curve Deterministic Random Bit
Generation: NIST strongly recommends that, pending the resolution of the security concerns and the
re-issuance of SP 800-90A, the Dual_EC_DRBG, as specified in the January 2012 version of SP 800-90A,
no longer be used.


A Follow-up

http://www.pcworld.com/article/2082720/ ... versy.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/ ... C220131220

The U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) paid $10 million to vendor RSA in a “secret” deal to incorporate a deliberately flawed encryption algorithm into widely used security software, according to a Reuters report that is reigniting controversy about the government’s involvement in setting security standards.
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11226
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Klaudandus » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:41 am

Klaudandus wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/12/16/judge-deals-nsa-defeat-on-bulk-phone-collection/


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/us/ns ... .html?_r=0

A federal judge in New York on Friday ruled that the National Security Agency’s program that is systematically keeping phone records of all Americans is lawful, creating a conflict among lower courts and increasing the likelihood that the issue will be resolved by the Supreme Court.


Some judges ruled against the NSA, others in favor of it. Time for some Supreme Court action!
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11226
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Amirya » Fri Dec 27, 2013 12:23 pm

I've read a couple of different articles about the previous ruling, and now I'm utterly confused.

Pauley apparently writes that there's no evidence that the NSA uses the bulk metadata for anything other than disrupting terrorism.

Leon apparently writes that there's no evidence that the NSA uses the bulk metadata to disrupt terrorism.

What the hell? So is the NSA disrupting terrorism with the metadata or not? If no, why the hell not? If yes, where's the evidence - hell, what are the stats on how many plans have been disrupted since, oh, 01/01/2013?
Image

Fetzie wrote:The Defias Brotherhood is back, and this time they are acting as racketeers in Goldshire. Anybody wishing to dance for money must now pay them protection money or be charged triple the normal amount when repairing.
Amirya
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 3994
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 2:59 am

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Nooska » Sat Dec 28, 2013 8:15 am

Sound slike its simply a pro/anti NSA ruling - it seems to be he same argument, just differing judgements on it.
Main Characters:
Nooska, Blood Elf BM/SV Hunter on Argent Dawn (EU)
Morosin, Bloody freezing orc death knight on Argent Dawn (EU)
Niisca, Shady forsaken "priest" on Argent Dawn (EU)

Keeper Emeritus of the BM hunters guide on Elitist Jerks and the wowhead version untill patch 5.3.
User avatar
Nooska
 
Posts: 1563
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:55 am

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Paxen » Sat Dec 28, 2013 9:43 am

Simple, the NSA doesn't use it for anything! They just keep it around for a rainy day.
Paxen
 
Posts: 617
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:38 am

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Nooska » Sat Dec 28, 2013 1:22 pm

But isn't the hallenge in collecting it (rather than using it)? (Unlawful search I'm guessing).

Of course, fruit of the poisoned tree ins't a deterrant for the NSA, since nothing they would actually act on would ever see the inside of an US courtroom anyway.
Main Characters:
Nooska, Blood Elf BM/SV Hunter on Argent Dawn (EU)
Morosin, Bloody freezing orc death knight on Argent Dawn (EU)
Niisca, Shady forsaken "priest" on Argent Dawn (EU)

Keeper Emeritus of the BM hunters guide on Elitist Jerks and the wowhead version untill patch 5.3.
User avatar
Nooska
 
Posts: 1563
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:55 am

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Klaudandus » Sun Dec 29, 2013 7:59 am

Somehow I missed these

http://www.spiegel.de/international/wor ... 40135.html
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013 ... mmissioner

And I'm sorry but...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-glas ... 90948.html
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201309 ... rism.shtml
http://rt.com/news/nsa-leaks-mexico-government-458/
(From oldest to newest)

Let me rehash again that it would be much easier to swallow the whole NSA spies to keep us safe from horrible Al-Qaeda if it wasn't so grossly invested in state sanctioned corporate espionage on the side.

and just for lulzy
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-d ... -non-guilt
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11226
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Klaudandus » Fri Jan 17, 2014 5:50 am

So there's this

http://timesfreepress.com/news/2014/jan ... tennessee/

The legislation would ban new health insurance exchanges established under the law. So far, more than 36,000 Tennesseans have signed up for coverage under the exchanges. More than 2 million people had enrolled through the end of the year, according to the most recent nationwide statistics.

but with the law of unintended consequences (although since its a republican, might be intended after all...)

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20140 ... ck_check=1

That could cause immediate problems for TennCare. Since Jan. 1, the state’s Medicaid program has been using HealthCare.gov to sign up new enrollees until a new state-run website is completed.

And then this

http://www.nashvillescene.com/pitw/arch ... cal-center

Since the law "empowers the General Assembly to enact sanctions, fines and penalties for violation of the proposed law and gives the state’s Attorney General the right to file a lawsuit against violators," will hospitals have to figure out not only if patients have insurance but how they got it before they risk treating them?
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11226
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Fivelives » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:08 pm

I was at work the other day and of course we have to have Faux News Network playing 24/7. No idea why - I've complained endlessly about it - but the talking heads were going on and on about how Obamacare is illegal.

I just wanted to mail them a letterbomb full of anthrax and radioactive waste with a little letter in it that says "Obamacare IS A LAW. Laws, by their very definition, cannot be illegal, especially since the United States Supreme Court already ruled the legislation passed constitutional muster."

Seriously, is there any way to get administration to stop turning the waiting room televisions to 24 hour news channels? I work 12+ hour shifts, Teh Stupidz is starting to give me migraines. I'd much rather watch NCIS marathons, or even the lifetime movie channel, or ANYTHING but news networks.
- I'm not Jesus, but I can turn water into Kool-Aid.
- A Sergeant in motion outranks an officer who doesn't know what the hell is going on.
- A demolitions specialist at a flat run outranks everybody.
User avatar
Fivelives
 
Posts: 3110
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:55 pm

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby KysenMurrin » Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:46 pm

What's the situation with licensing fees for public broadcasting? Could be restrictions what they can show.
Temporarily playing WoW again.
Donnan - Nangun - Kysen - Kysen - Mardun - Timkins

Mostly-Book Blog.
KysenMurrin
 
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:37 am
Location: UK

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Fridmarr » Fri Jan 17, 2014 7:42 pm

Cable news networks like FoxNews aren't publicly broadcast (thus the term "cable"), you have to pay for them. So if they have FoxNews, they have will also have plenty of other channels that they are free to show. They could also freely show any broadcast station that they pickup.

Anyhow typically news networks are shown in waiting rooms and what not because there is little cause for concern about the content, and someone will generally find it interesting. It's kind of neutral content.

Though I doubt you'll get them to put on a network with shows, and I doubt they care too much about one employee complaining about what's on TV while they are paying him to work, you may be able to convince them to put on ESPN or even the PAC 12 network in your neck of the woods.
Fridmarr
Global Mod
 
Posts: 9669
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:03 am

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Klaudandus » Sat Jan 18, 2014 5:38 pm

The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11226
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Fivelives » Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:00 pm

We've got all the channels except for the premium pay stations (HBO etc). It seems like every doctor's office and hospital waiting room in this crapsack town has the TV firmly set on fox news. You can't escape it anywhere you go here.
- I'm not Jesus, but I can turn water into Kool-Aid.
- A Sergeant in motion outranks an officer who doesn't know what the hell is going on.
- A demolitions specialist at a flat run outranks everybody.
User avatar
Fivelives
 
Posts: 3110
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:55 pm

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby fuzzygeek » Sun Jan 19, 2014 4:16 pm

Klaudandus wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hoboken-mayor-christie-aides-tied-sandy-fund-requests-to-support-for-project/2014/01/18/d6f63e86-805d-11e3-9556-4a4bf7bcbd84_story.html

Thoughts?


Dang they're revving up the smear machine early. Too early, I think.
Image
User avatar
fuzzygeek
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 5130
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:58 pm

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Brekkie » Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:55 pm

Fivelives wrote:We've got all the channels except for the premium pay stations (HBO etc). It seems like every doctor's office and hospital waiting room in this crapsack town has the TV firmly set on fox news. You can't escape it anywhere you go here.


This is my guess:

The majority of people who frequent hospitals are probably old people. Old people tend to be Conservative. Hence, Fox News.
It's the same reason why the TVs in the military chow halls were always permanently on Fox News. Demographics.
Theckhd wrote:big numbers are the in-game way of expressing that Brekkie's penis is huge.
Brekkie
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:44 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Arkham Asylum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 380 on Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest