Remove Advertisements

Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Invisusira's playground

Moderators: Aergis, Invisusira

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Fridmarr » Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:02 pm

Still terrible. Tying gov't assistance for a household to a child's academic achievement is fundamentally flawed.
 
Unfortunately, it sounds like that legislation is moving forward.
Fridmarr
Global Mod
 
Posts: 9665
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:03 am

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Darielle » Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:51 pm

Thinking more about it, I was thinking of a compromise. You really don't remove assistance to the families, but you do reduce it by a set percentage, conversely... if the kid does really well, you reward the family by increasing their assistance by a set percentage.


There's no reward in the system unless they're actually getting welfare beyond what they should be (and if that's the case, the hell is the point of the welfare system?), it's just straight punishment.

More, you're putting income in the hands of a kid, adding pressure on top of the pressures of school/being a kid. It's all a recipe for superflaw.

Some kids are just not as good at exams. Some kids walk in with no study and ace it.
Darielle
 
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:41 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Koatanga » Wed Apr 10, 2013 5:54 pm

It will probably pass because to be politically correct you have to assume that all people are in fact equal and therefore equally capable of performing in school. In reality, you don't generally find brilliant people who can't do any better in life than to collect welfare money, so welfare recipients tend to be in the lower-IQ range, the genes for which they pass along to their children, along with study habits and general attitude toward school that the kids learn from their parents.

Welfare kids are, in general, screwed on both the nature and nurture fronts. That's why success stories about kids emerging from the ghetto to do well in life are interesting. If it was commonplace, it wouldn't be interesting.
Retired. Koatanga, Shapely, Sultry, Doominatrix of Greenstone - Dath'Remar
Koatanga
 
Posts: 1980
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:46 pm

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Fridmarr » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:39 pm

Koatanga wrote:It will probably pass because to be politically correct you have to assume that all people are in fact equal
You've mentioned this a couple of times, so I think it's worth pointing out that your understanding of how this works does not seem to be accurate.

No where in the constitution (to include the bill of rights), is there a mention about men being created equal. That "prose" comes from the Declaration of Independence which isn't a legislative document. The closest thing the constitution has is the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.

Regardless, the notion (even in the Declaration of Independence) has never been understood to mean anything other than equal standing under the law. It's quite obvious that people are not in fact equal, and that's never been a legislative standard in the US. This particular legislation is definitely not "politically correct" in any sense of the expression. Heck, considering the demographics of folks whom would be penalized, it's actually quite at odds with the notion of political correctness.
Fridmarr
Global Mod
 
Posts: 9665
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:03 am

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby fuzzygeek » Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:25 pm

I think it was more a reference to one party demanding Equality of Outcome, whilst the other demands Equality of Opportunity. One stance is certainly seen as being more "PC" than the other.
Image
User avatar
fuzzygeek
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 5130
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:58 pm

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Paxen » Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:52 pm

fuzzygeek wrote:I think it was more a reference to one party demanding Equality of Outcome, whilst the other demands Equality of Opportunity. One stance is certainly seen as being more "PC" than the other.


I'd have more respect for the "Equality of Opportunity" folks if opportunity was, in fact, equal, when it's so blindingly obvious that the opportunities for a kid whose parents went to Harvard are miles above the opportunities of a ghetto kid.
Paxen
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:38 am

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby fuzzygeek » Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:14 am

Paxen wrote:I'd have more respect for the "Equality of Opportunity" folks if opportunity was, in fact, equal, when it's so blindingly obvious that the opportunities for a kid whose parents went to Harvard are miles above the opportunities of a ghetto kid.


So how do you address the disparity?
Image
User avatar
fuzzygeek
Maintankadonor
 
Posts: 5130
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:58 pm

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby KysenMurrin » Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:22 am

Socialism. Unfortunately.
I don't play WoW any more.
Donnan - Nangun - Kysen - Kysen - Mardun - Timkins

Mostly-Book Blog.
KysenMurrin
 
Posts: 6825
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:37 am
Location: UK

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Paxen » Thu Apr 11, 2013 1:31 am

fuzzygeek wrote:So how do you address the disparity?


Plenty of ways. The first step is admitting that there is a problem, and realizing that poor people are usually not dumb and lazy.
Paxen
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:38 am

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Klaudandus » Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:21 am

The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11058
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Klaudandus » Thu Apr 11, 2013 6:01 am

The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11058
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Fivelives » Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:42 am

In wildly other news, any thoughts on this whole "Operation Northwoods" thing running around the internet? It looks like lame conspiracy fodder to me, but considering the responsibilities of think tanks it's not impossible that it's legit. Think tanks are there specifically to come up with off-the-wall contingency plans (including things that will probably NEVER happen like zombie outbreaks and alien invasions), and it could be a legitimate think tank plan. Although it stinks to absolute high heavens that it wasn't declassified during an automatic review like most other declassified documents (at 10/25/50/75 years - this one was declassified at 51 years). Although it could've been late just because of a backlog in the classification review system.
- I'm not Jesus, but I can turn water into Kool-Aid.
- A Sergeant in motion outranks an officer who doesn't know what the hell is going on.
- A demolitions specialist at a flat run outranks everybody.
User avatar
Fivelives
 
Posts: 3108
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:55 pm

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Nooska » Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:58 am

KysenMurrin wrote:Socialism. Unfortunately.

*likes*. *dislikes*. (in that order)

But to stay on the subject matter, it is an idea that causes its own failure. If my family recieves les welfare because my kid does poorly in school, how am I then to support the kid to do better, when I have even more trouble making ends meet? its not something that causes less stress and more time/surplus to help and tutor my kid to become better, and I just lost a chunk of money that could possibly have been invested in a tutor.

Not if we wanut kids to have a better outcome, we (yeah, "we", though I'm not US) should incentivize extra help - kid doing poorly in school? you qualify for an extra "check" for tutelage - quite easy to avoid scamming as it could just be a school run programme, or the money went straight to the tutor (who should be approved by a relevant authority)
Main Characters:
Nooska, Blood Elf BM/SV Hunter on Argent Dawn (EU)
Morosin, Bloody freezing orc death knight on Argent Dawn (EU)
Niisca, Shady forsaken "priest" on Argent Dawn (EU)

Keeper Emeritus of the BM hunters guide on Elitist Jerks and the wowhead version untill patch 5.3.
User avatar
Nooska
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:55 am

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby KysenMurrin » Fri Apr 12, 2013 6:15 am

I have to agree that giving additional funds to help struggling students is the much better way to approach things - and you'd do it through schools funding, not on individual families.

Welfare is supposed to provide what the recipient needs, not what they deserve (by some arbitrary and unfair definition of worth).
I don't play WoW any more.
Donnan - Nangun - Kysen - Kysen - Mardun - Timkins

Mostly-Book Blog.
KysenMurrin
 
Posts: 6825
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:37 am
Location: UK

Re: Politics (formerly Election 2012)

Postby Klaudandus » Fri Apr 12, 2013 10:02 am

Not sure what Fridmarr would think of this
http://news.yahoo.com/5-hard-changes-ad ... 00206.html
The Element of Forum Hyperbole
Image
---
Flüttershy - Draenei Protection Paladin, Aerie Peak
Klaudandus - BE Protection Paladin, Feathermoon (Semi-retired)
User avatar
Klaudandus
 
Posts: 11058
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:08 am
Location: Texas' Armpit

PreviousNext

Return to Arkham Asylum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest


Remove Advertisements

Who is online

In total there are 2 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 380 on Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:28 pm

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest